Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ

 All Forums
 General Discussion
 Collectors and Users Open Forum
 Moskva 5 - Some Tests

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Antispam question: Please provide registration password:
Answer:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

New! Upload Image

Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
DcAnalogue Posted - May 21 2015 : 12:37:04 PM
Hi to all USSR cameras lovers!

Here are a couple shots made with my "new" Moskva 5

I made 2 test rolls: First with Tri-x & Adonal and Second with Adox CMS 20 & Ars-Imago Fd Developer (It's a new developer from an Italian/Swiss company. It seems good, practical and cheap. So I made a test with an hard to manage film. The reasons why I did it are written in my blog)


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/2152015_001_Moskva 5_Trix_004.jpg

First Roll - Moskva 5 (6X6) & Tri-x in Adonal
See more here: https://thefilmrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/05/09/cccp-moskva-5-first-test/


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/2152015_001_Moskva 5_CMS 20_002.jpg

Second Roll - Moskva 5 (6X9) & Adox CMS 20 in Ars-Imago Fd
See more here: https://thefilmrenaissance.wordpress.com/2015/05/19/test-adox-cms-20-developed-in-ars-imago-fd-part-two/

Btw. Moskva performed very good functionally and had a good I.Q. in 6X6 format. The 6X9 format showed less performance of images borders (apart for the not so good performance of the film itself and the difficult scans of...curling 6X9 film).

I bought my Moskva from an Ebay seller (an English guy who makes his business in Ukraine), who proved affordable (so, I've just bought again from him a Fotokor 1 9x12....). I'll write a post about him in the specific forum of USSRphoto soon....


Fsu Cams:
35 mm - Kiev 4, Zorky 4K
120: Moskva 5, Lubitel 166U
L.F. - Fotokor 1

My Film Photography Blog: https://thefilmrenaissance.wordpress.com/
6   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
DcAnalogue Posted - Jun 05 2015 : 01:24:51 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Lenny

Of course now with much better film you can get different results than back in 1956. I like the square format too. How many photos can you shoot per roll with 6x6 and 6x9? If you can shoot more photos per roll in 6x6 how did they manage that the film advance transports less film? Would have been great to have this feature on a Zorki, 24x24.



Don't know if film performs better now than in 1956 'cause I wasn't born yet (I was in '58)
But, some people still is nostalgic with some old emulsions and some of the actual films should be very similar to these (i.e. fomapan).
After all, photography has always been made (and... well made) for decades before now....

In my cameras I don't shot more frames per roll. Some has the automatic advance feature too (Rolleiflex, SuperIkonta etc) and with others I don't even know how to do it. But I use medium format really to shot few (but good) frames... So, 12 (in 6x6) and 8 (in 6x9) are enough for me. When I need more I use the Nettar (6x4,5) wher I get 16 frames. I bought an Agfa ISoly too with a 4x4 format but doesn't work and impossible to repair 'cause of missing parts. Actually I'm testing a Bencini Koroll 2: an Italian strange camera which shots 24 frames on 120 roll... We'll see how it works...

Soviet Cams:
35 mm - Kiev 4, Zorky 4K - Lomo Voskod
120: Moskva 5, Lubitel 166U
L.F. - Fotokor 1

My Film Photography Blog: https://thefilmrenaissance.wordpress.com/
Lenny Posted - Jun 05 2015 : 12:07:33 AM
Of course now with much better film you can get different results than back in 1956. I like the square format too. How many photos can you shoot per roll with 6x6 and 6x9? If you can shoot more photos per roll in 6x6 how did they manage that the film advance transports less film? Would have been great to have this feature on a Zorki, 24x24.
DcAnalogue Posted - May 21 2015 : 3:45:56 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Jacques M.

Hi Dc!

I had already seen some on your photos on your blog.
Bravo!
I wonder if I will not buy a 6x6 camera one of these days. Just to change a bit...

If you want to show more photos, you can do it in the "photo gallery" forum.

Amitiés. Jacques.



Thanks Jaques!

Well, the square format is very interesting and "well balanced" in framing. Many loves it unconditionally, while other hate it the same way....
I like it very much....

Tomorrow I will test the "new" Lubitel.....
Of course, I'll post other photos in the gallery.
This time I posted here by mistake....

Fsu Cams:
35 mm - Kiev 4, Zorky 4K
120: Moskva 5, Lubitel 166U
L.F. - Fotokor 1

My Film Photography Blog: https://thefilmrenaissance.wordpress.com/
DcAnalogue Posted - May 21 2015 : 3:41:52 PM
quote:
Originally posted by jed

Congratulations !



Thanks Jed!

Fsu Cams:
35 mm - Kiev 4, Zorky 4K
120: Moskva 5, Lubitel 166U
L.F. - Fotokor 1

My Film Photography Blog: https://thefilmrenaissance.wordpress.com/
Jacques M. Posted - May 21 2015 : 2:13:57 PM
Hi Dc!

I had already seen some on your photos on your blog.
Bravo!
I wonder if I will not buy a 6x6 camera one of these days. Just to change a bit...

If you want to show more photos, you can do it in the "photo gallery" forum.

Amitiés. Jacques.
jed Posted - May 21 2015 : 2:12:24 PM
Congratulations !

USSRPhoto.com Forums © USSRPhoto.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
Google