Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ

 All Forums
 General Discussion
 Collectors and Users Open Forum
 Weird Jupiter-8M PT3615

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Antispam question: Please provide registration password:
Answer:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

New! Upload Image

Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Moxies Posted - Oct 28 2018 : 10:00:21 AM
Hello everybody,

After a discussion with Vlad, I follow his advice and post some pictures of this Jupiter-8M lens I received few days ago (in fact, I received 2 of them).
After comparaison (size, weight, image rendering, and visual comparaison), this Jupiter-8M is an Helios-103, I'm 100% sure about that. When you set diaphragme at f2, you are in fact at f1.8.

Now the question is what's happened in Arsenal so they did this?

Vlad already gave me a possible answer from his friend I. Zotikov, saying that they quickly planned production of new body Jupiter-8M, but they didn't had enough Jupiter-8M, so instead they put Helios-103 blocks in it (as far as I understood).

I'm curious to hear your opinion about this Jupiter-8M.

#1


#2


#3


#4


#5


#6


#7


#8


#9


#10


USSRPhoto.com Forums © USSRPhoto.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
Google