USSRPhoto.com Forums

All Forums

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:

UserName:

Password:

Antispam question:

Please provide registration password:

Answer:

Format Mode:

Format:

Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

New! Upload Image

Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.

T O P I C R E V I E W
mermoz37	Posted - May 24 2008 : 05:24:23 AM here is from yzhoo zenit group http://picasaweb.google.de/hstraske/ZenitVersusLeica/photo#5203653062372429682
2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First)
Vlad	Posted - May 24 2008 : 7:45:45 PM It is interesting, it also seems like Leicaflex had a longer lens than Zenit.. also as I understand Leicaflex was never a successful camera in comparison to its rangefinder counterpart, it would be more interesting to see one of the FEDs compared to a Leica rangerfinder... like maybe FED 5 with I-61L/D vs. a Leica M6.. Vlad
Luiz Paracampo	Posted - May 24 2008 : 11:49:24 AM Allain Very good! But there is no data about film or development. Also about lenses used in comparison. Leica pictures are more saturated and in general slightly greater. If it were used Summicron versus Helios44, it would have happened the reverse once the 58mm is greater than 50mm. Normally there are no differences in this picture size and with internet resolution, but in my opinion Leica pictures used a polarization filter. Without any technical data it is difficult to judge Let's Bill be the judge with his large experience. Regards Luiz

USSRPhoto.com Forums