| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Alexander K.
AlexanderK
Germany
590 Posts |
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4251 Posts
My Collection
|
 Posted - Jan 06 2013 : 1:35:35 PM
|
Most interesting! I can only offer an opinion in this case. I am unsure about the space designation of this camera as there is no documentation but the quality of the build is too high to be a home made camera in my opinion.
Price is also quite interesting :)
Thanks for the link!
Cheers,
Vlad |
 |
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4251 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jan 06 2013 : 1:42:28 PM
|
| Actually on the other hand after examining the open back and the bottom hinges, use of the larger screws and the crude quality of hinges is somewhat suspicious, especially with the claim of it being space camera, where Soviets spared no expense even for prototypes... Any other opinions? |
|
|
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1997 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jan 06 2013 : 2:17:07 PM
|
I had seen the same front adapted un another type of Russian camera some years ago
I can't remember exactly when and where or if I have the image
Regards
LP |
|
|
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1997 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jan 07 2013 : 07:57:22 AM
|
Have one see this seller's prices?
PhotoAlps!
You must climb the highness of the Alps to pay his prices!
Regards
LP |
|
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4251 Posts
My Collection
|
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4251 Posts
My Collection
|
|
David Cormack
davemac
Ireland
1 Posts |
Posted - Jan 07 2013 : 7:04:30 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
Actually on the other hand after examining the open back and the bottom hinges, use of the larger screws and the crude quality of hinges is somewhat suspicious, especially with the claim of it being space camera, where Soviets spared no expense even for prototypes... Any other opinions?
The rust spots on the hinges and body indicate the use of steel or another ferrous metal, an unlikely choice due to the weight of these materials.
Also the frame number windows on the rear would be unlikely due to the requirement for radiation shielding on anything going into orbit.
I am aware that the Americans used Hasselblads, which are heavy, however since this is allegedly designed specifically for the space program the design seems odd. |
|
|
okynek
759 Posts |
Posted - Jan 08 2013 : 1:59:11 PM
|
Very good camera, but it most definitely "home made".
Viewfinder still has unneeded shatter,
Viewfinder usually has different lens then shatter,
Shatters are different on right and left,
I can not find mechanics to cock both shatters together.
I can not find mechanics to set aperture and speed on both shatters at the same time.
The only what seems to work for all 3 lenses is focus ring.
Writings on the middle ring taken from one more lens.
All screws are not up to experimental cameras, or space camera, as it was mentioned earlier.
Never the less camera seems to be very well made. Great to have in collection for price below 1/10 of the advertised  |
|
|
Ulrich W.
uwittehh
Germany
834 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jan 08 2013 : 2:34:34 PM
|
Wow, another ebay-account of Boris Jamchtchik. How many does he have? ;-)
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
|
|
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1997 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jan 09 2013 : 5:22:28 PM
|
Perfectly true Vlad!
Did spacial craft be buid as such cameras every mission would blow before departure.
Regards LP |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Lomo Stereo Sputnik Prototype space camera
... 
