Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ

 All Forums
 General Discussion
 Collectors and Users Open Forum
 Pre / Post-war User Contax - not sensible ?

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Antispam question: Please provide registration password:
Answer:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

New! Upload Image

Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
dee Posted - Jul 31 2012 : 4:44:51 PM
I have been pondering .
In comparison to a Kiev II or IIa , a pre-war Contax is old , with limited used spares and ex[pensive to repair / service .
The post war Contax may be somewhat more elegant , but is both more expensive with a similar cost to repair etc .
A 1950s Kiev can economically be repaired / CLA by OLeg providing years of sterling service .
Many have confirmed that an early Kiev is the equal of a Contax . My sole Kiev IIa was £60 , virtually mint . Even my CLA 1951 KII [ later lens ] was just £140 which is silly price for the quality of this kind .
1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Gelios Posted - Aug 01 2012 : 11:17:47 AM
The problem is that early '50 Kiev are rather expensive now, so expensive I rather buy a post-war Contax instead.

USSRPhoto.com Forums © USSRPhoto.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
Google