| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| AidasCams |
Posted - Mar 09 2009 : 06:05:28 AM
Many thanks to Juhani for opportunity to obtain (and to test either...  ) very uncommon Industar-61L 2.8/50mm (LZOS) lens!
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/i-61l_3.jpg
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/i-61l_4.jpg
Best regards,
Aidas
|
| 10 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Aug 08 2016 : 09:32:55 AM
Thanks; it's certainly the most probable.
I have put it into the wiki: http://ussrphoto.com/Wiki/default.asp?ContentID=1662&ParentID=2&WikiCatID=25
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| Moxies |
Posted - Aug 03 2016 : 06:40:09 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Jacques M.
Yes, Pierre, I think too about the only year of production: 1964.
But I wonder why it was made so late. A special pre-production with lantham, which will be used by Fed?
Anyway, by what I know, the Jup 8 were better than these Fed lenses. So...
Not yet here, for the moment.
Amitiés. Jacques.
Well, maybe LZOS computed this lens first, which is possible since AFAIK they has good reputation about special optical glass. When production moved to kharkov, it was decided to use a more simple construction, similar to I-26 in order to decrease cost of production.
About the reason to do it while jupiter produced, maybe again just a question of cost production. I guess tessar design is easier to produce than sonnar. |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Aug 01 2016 : 4:09:57 PM
Yes, Pierre, I think too about the only year of production: 1964.
But I wonder why it was made so late. A special pre-production with lantham, which will be used by Fed?
Anyway, by what I know, the Jup 8 were better than these Fed lenses. So...
Not yet here, for the moment.
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| Moxies |
Posted - Jul 29 2016 : 5:04:39 PM
I think this lens was only made in 1964.
Btw I saw one (missed it in auction) 64073 without "L". So maybe first ones were without "L".
Photo from auction
|
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Jul 25 2016 : 08:14:20 AM
Hello!
I have just found one of these lenses.
They seem rare...
If you had some details about this series, how many were made, etc. I just wonder too why exactly they were made. Mine is a 1964 one, and at that date, a Sonnar formula (Jup 8) was certainly better than that Tessar one, even well coated...
Thanks. Amitiés. Jacques. |
| Vlad |
Posted - Mar 10 2009 : 8:20:12 PM
Daaaamn this one is sharp! I think I-61's are made and optimized for color though.. Try it with color film you won't be disappointed!
Vlad |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 09 2009 : 12:25:04 PM
Fine pictures and rare lens (I didn't know it).
Thanks, Aidas.
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| Poolhall |
Posted - Mar 09 2009 : 12:22:35 PM
I understand now, yes it is totally different in build, thanks for the quick answer! Looks good as well!
Samsung GX-10,too many Russian Lenses, A lot of Zenit, some Yashica,and a Pentax Body also finally a Minox35GT |
| AidasCams |
Posted - Mar 09 2009 : 08:26:28 AM
Hi Richard,
thanks for your question! Though "lanthan" Industar-61 lenses were very popular on RF Fed cameras (since 1962), very limited batch of them were issued on Lutkarino optical glass factory (my lens has date prefix "64"). These RF lenses have absolutely different body construction indeed (see picture below).
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/P3020026.JPG
Best Regards,
Aidas
|
| Poolhall |
Posted - Mar 09 2009 : 07:52:31 AM
Pardon my ignorance Aidas but what is the difference between this and the Industar 61 L/Z? Is it for rf cameras? Nice images too btw seems to suit B+W very well.
Samsung GX-10,too many Russian Lenses, A lot of Zenit, some Yashica,and a Pentax Body also finally a Minox35GT |
