Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ

 All Forums
 General Discussion
 Collectors and Users Open Forum
 Mistakes & Proposed Corrections to 1200 Camera

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Antispam question: What letter is used to denote aperture on a lens?
Answer:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

New! Upload Image

Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Vlad Posted - Jan 17 2010 : 10:45:29 AM
Okynek,

regarding you entry: " And later on same page 229 Start turrel and sniper: are any confirmation that thouse made by KMZ?" I think we should not put questioning statements into the list, but rather obvious and confirmed mistakes or inconsistencies. You know what I mean?

So I think there should first be a separate forum discussion about the item in question before it goes on the list of mistakes/correction to see if we get any proof/disproof or confirmation from our members. I'd like to definitely start off by giving a benefit of a doubt to the authors who had obviously spent a lot of time research this information and then if we do find indisputable proof or inconsistency in their description or theory, then put that on the list. If you don't mind I will remove that item from the entry.

Thanks,
Vlad.
3   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Vlad Posted - Jan 17 2010 : 12:14:15 PM
We certainly can, but my opinion it's a little premature still.. a second edition of the book has not been even yet announced . This particular entry is mostly for us to refer to as well as a guide (or correction appendix for the book) and Viktor and the team is free to use and review this entry if they do decide to publish another edition.

Cheers,
Vlad.

okynek Posted - Jan 17 2010 : 11:59:05 AM
Yes, sure Vlad, take those comments out.
I believe we also need entry in Wiki for missing in the SSK book cameras and variation of the cameras. What do you think?
Vlad Posted - Jan 17 2010 : 10:47:29 AM
And please create SEPARATE thread for discussions of any potential issues with the book and then reference it in the wiki if it pans out to be inconsistency.

Thanks,
Vlad.

USSRPhoto.com Forums © USSRPhoto.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
Google