Droug winding mechanism Printed from: USSRPhoto.com Forums Topic: Topic author: uwittehh
Subject: Droug winding mechanism Have you ever seen the winding mechanism of a Droug?
Replies:
Reply author: kktra080 Dear Ulrich,
Reply author: Valkir1987 Well, when everything is stripped and cleaned down to the last screw and finally relubricated, a lot of friction is gone. PTFE grease really helps, but there is a lot of tension and strain on the winding action.
Reply author: Lenny Thanks Ulrich, never saw this chain before. The chain wheels are quite small and will take much power if the chain isn't oiled. After so many years this will be a major reason if winding isn't smooth.
Reply author: cedricfan No, it is the other way round!
Reply author: Lenny
quote: I wonder how strong the spring is at the end of the chain. This construction could never be as smooth as a Zorki-6 and if it wasn't recently serviced it even might not be as fast as a Zorki-6. After use it could be that your hands are oiled too. Unbelievable that they produced 24000 pieces of it in 1960 and 1961. Did they have a warranty back in those days? How many did they get back? Now I can imagine why they called it Friend ![]()
Reply author: cedricfan Sometimes the Soviet products were not intended to be sold in quantities, or being working. But a space country wanted to show that they can it, and in all possible ways.
Reply author: Valkir1987
quote: Not only the Soviets made such prestige products. Such products can be found in any nation. The Foca Universal is a French example of such camera.
Reply author: Fred_L Hi Milo
Reply author: Valkir1987
quote: Well, maybe not really fair of me to compare the Droug with the Foca Universal. The Drough matches known camera technology in a compact design. The Foca is different, both the cosmetics and the shutter are unique designs. However, they share some kind of prestige. Like they where made by the factories to be proud of. Of course I reject the quoted statement that both camera's where about to be sold as non working. Can't remember exactly if it was the Universal or the URC, we had one for repair a few years ago. The owner was a Dutch reporter who worked in France at that time. He used it in that time with full satisfaction, but it needed repair and maintenance often. The shutter turned out to be complicated (perhaps to avoid Leica patents) The lenses for this camera where really beautiful though.
Reply author: Vlad Wow, that's very cool! Never though it would have a chain like that inside! Ulrich - I applaud your willingness and fearlessness disassembling these cameras!
Reply author: Lenny
quote: As Luiz showed in the other thread, the Canon is much better engineered, the Canon needs only one chain wheel. And the solution was so easy, the Canon is only a reverse system which then doesn't need two chain wheels. Superior. I can imagine that after the Canon came out that KMZ stopped their production. What a shame. On the other hand KMZ did a good job to develop the Zorki-1. The 1d and 1e versions with the small shutter spring work much better. But that was 6 years earlier.
Reply author: cedricfan
quote: How does a Japanese camera model affect on a Soviet production? None. FSU was an almost closed market regarding import. Also cyrillic versions were not exported to west in quantities. So being cyrillic model means same time a domestic model, without outside competition. Best regards, Juhani USSRPhoto.com Forums : http://USSRPhoto.com/forum/ © USSRPhoto.com |