Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


 All Forums
 General Discussion
 Collectors and Users Open Forum
 Back from Bièvres
 New Topic
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Fred_L
France
226 Posts
Posted - Jun 07 2015 :  1:52:28 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi all,

Very interresting edition this year.
Lot of Polish guys selling our favorite cameras...
I have met JED too... Very nice guy! Hi Jed!! You will see I have cleaned a little bit the Kiev.. It was grey painting!!!!

I have found some cameras, only soviet cameras, excepting one Japanese...But impossible to resist to this one....

Enjoy, and may be the best location should be "just arrived in my collection?"

Your comments are welcome, and I am sure Jacques will have some!!!!

Fred


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed 2-50_01.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed 2-50_02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed 2-50_03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed 2-50_04.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed 2-50_05.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_4184_01.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_4184_02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_4184_03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_4184_04.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_4184_05.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_Red-Flag__01.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_Red-Flag__02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_Red-Flag__03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_Red-Flag__05.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_Red-Flag__07.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_Red-Flag__08.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Fed_Red-Flag__10.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Kiev_48_02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Kiev_48_03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Kiev_48_04.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Kiev_48_05.jpg




http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Kiev_48_07.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Kiev_48_09.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Tcaika-3_01.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Tcaika-3_02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Tcaika-3_03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Tcaika-3_04.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zenit-S_01.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zenit-S_02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zenit-S_03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zenit-S_05.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zorki Export_01.jpg


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zorki Export_02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zorki Export_03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zorki-4-50eme_01.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zorki-4-50eme_02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Zorki-4-50eme_03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Canon_7_02.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Canon_7_03.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Canon_7_04.jpg



http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015_Canon_7_05.jpg

Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 07 2015 :  2:16:11 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi Fred!

It seems you have bought all the fair!
Your Fed s/n 140716 is interesting with a 2/50mm Fed lens.

The s/n 4184 is of course one of these curious Fed with a 1a s/n and a 1b body. Yours belongs to the last 1b series, with the special vulcanite (which we can see too on the early 1c). A very rare item.

The s/n 201578 is a fake Red Flag. Good serial number, but some errors in the engravings. The lens and the vulcanite are not correct. But it is an interesting camera. I just hope you don't pay it too much for it.

My last comments to morrow. But wow and congrats for the 0.95 Canon!! I do hope you will try it and tell me more about it!!

Amitiés. Jacques.
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 07 2015 :  2:41:18 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

Fred,

I know it's a bit OT here.
But I have a 1,1/50mm Sonnetar in M mount. It would be interesting to make comparisons with your 0,95 Canon ...

Jacques.
Go to Top of Page

Fred_L
France
226 Posts
Posted - Jun 07 2015 :  2:50:13 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thank you Jacques

About Red Flag, I have shown it to Princelle
He said it should be an original one, but who knows?
What are the signs that makes it is a fake, please?

For the price, no problem, I have bought it with the 4186 to same guy at good price..

Fred
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 07 2015 :  4:47:21 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks Fred for all these photos. I see you found some special ones. I like the Caika and the Canon is a monster. That makes much work later when buying 9 cameras at one time. Sad if some sellers offer fakes there. Great you met Princelle, that would have been the highlight for me. Hope you had a good time.
Go to Top of Page

Alexander K.
AlexanderK
Germany
590 Posts
Posted - Jun 07 2015 :  5:36:07 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi Fred,
nice cameras, congratulation! I hope they make you happy.
The only trouble is a FED-NKAP. This camera seems to be a fake. Here are some signs you can check:

1) as Jacques already noted, the vulcanite is wrong. These cameras have very special vulcanite and due to this vulcanite they are almost impossible to be confused. You must always think about it, if you take any FED-NKAP in your hand. We have already discussed it in this thread: http://ussrphoto.com/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2829

2) the next one is the engraving on the top plate. I show you mine and you can compare them:


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/762015__MG_7029.JPG



Regards, Alexander
Go to Top of Page

jed
France
391 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  12:18:58 AM  Show Profile  Visit jed's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Hi all,

I was pleased to meet Fred We missed Francesco as we didn't have a phone number...

As a Kiev-Contax friend I bought this, three non working bodies plus a Jupiter 12

Congrats your kiev '48' is genuine to me



Edited by - jed on Jun 08 2015 12:19:27 AM
Go to Top of Page

Juhani Halmeenmaki
cedricfan
Finland
1020 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  01:15:57 AM  Show Profile  Visit cedricfan's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Wow, very nice cameras indeed!
I would love to know what is the real price level of such wonders in Bievres, but I am afraid that Fred will not share that information with us.

Best regards,
Juhani
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  03:30:40 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by cedricfan

I would love to know what is the real price level of such wonders in Bievres



Fred's Zorki-1 #40016 I never saw offered before. It seems there are sellers who don't use online auctions for sale and you can find unknown samples in Bievres. That's much more interesting to me if you are looking for special models like a Smena-5 or early Kievs which are kind of rare. Good if you are living close to Paris.
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  03:54:43 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

Hi Fred!

Your 1948 Kiev is an original mix (I think) of Dresden and Jena parts, Dresden for the arrow, Jena for the rangefinder wheel. It seems too that the "3" under the lens has a flat top, so, a Dresden part. Very interesting camera which should help us to discuss!

As for the "Red Flag", I think it's a fake, unhappily. Alexander's one is true (for me) and mine too, probably, even if there is a line of engravings which misses. On yours, the letters are really different... I don't insist on the vulcanite.
Of course, one never exactly knows with these very special series: there can be variations. But it's difficult to imagine variations in the design of the letters.

JL Princelle had a great merit: to write his famous book. Thanks to him, the FSU cameras were thrown up. But I sent him a letter two years ago about a question of number Fed 2/5cm lens vs. Fed S camera. No answer... I am not sure he is always really interested by our hobby, alas...

Amitiés. Jacques.
Go to Top of Page
Pierre Tizien
Moxies
France
183 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  04:18:05 AM  Show Profile  Visit Moxies's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I went there, found nothing. For those who don't collect zorki or FED, there isn't anything really interesting.
There was only a russian seller selling OKS or Lenkinap lenses at insane price...
Also talked a bit with JL Princelle .
As Jacques told, I think Princelle is not really interested anymore in FSU cameras and lenses.

Edited by - Moxies on Jun 08 2015 04:22:41 AM
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  05:12:06 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Moxies

Also talked a bit with JL Princelle .
As Jacques told, I think Princelle is not really interested anymore in FSU cameras and lenses.



That's understandable. Princelle's book "300 Leica copies" is from 1990, his russian camera book is from when, maybe 2002. It's hard to keep a hobby for more than 25 years when you only have one life. And now with all the online auctions the availability of information is just too much to keep track. And also, now it's much more difficult to get rare things than 10 years ago. But still great that he visited Bievres. Good if you had a chance to talk with him.
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  06:55:53 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

I don't understand how it is possible to speak of somebody when you have never seen him or discussed with him...

Back to the (main) topic, and specially the Kiev II.
It seems that the lens was wiped from the black paint. Not the first time I see that. Certainly, it's not an unfinished lens, as the s/n shows it is inside the series (=not at the limits).
About the body, it would be fine if you could examine closely the disc under the selftimer: are they rests of black paint (= Jena part) or of chrome (= Dresden parts), Fred?

Amitiés. Jacques.
Go to Top of Page
Sandor Szilagyi
Messsucher
Hungary
34 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  08:22:11 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi there! Long time not here...

Imho there are two worrisome things:
- the chrome is finer then the surronding
- the edges of the top plate is not rounded (anymore), looks like after filing...

Cheers!

But I may be wrong!

Edited by - Messsucher on Jun 08 2015 08:26:06 AM
Go to Top of Page

Fred_L
France
226 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  1:58:06 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Jacques M.


I don't understand how it is possible to speak of somebody when you have never seen him or discussed with him...

Back to the (main) topic, and specially the Kiev II.
It seems that the lens was wiped from the black paint. Not the first time I see that. Certainly, it's not an unfinished lens, as the s/n shows it is inside the series (=not at the limits).
About the body, it would be fine if you could examine closely the disc under the selftimer: are they rests of black paint (= Jena part) or of chrome (= Dresden parts), Fred?



Amitiés. Jacques.



Thank you Jacques
I think the disc under selftimer has never been chromed.
It has black paint traces, but impossible to say if they were made later or not. Camera had grey painting on top when I bought it......
About Red Flag fake, I will disassemble it to see what's inside!!!

Have nice evening

Fred
Go to Top of Page

Fred_L
France
226 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  2:04:07 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by cedricfan

Wow, very nice cameras indeed!
I would love to know what is the real price level of such wonders in Bievres, but I am afraid that Fred will not share that information with us.

Best regards,
Juhani



Hi Juhani
I bought the fake Red Flag and #4186 for 300 euros. The Fed with 2/50mm for 70 euros. The Zorki 1 for 60 euros. and the Kiev for 200 euros. Canon 7 with 0.95, much more expensive...

Fred
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  2:20:13 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi
Both cameras are fake. NKAP already discussed. 4184 middle windows is square and accessory shoe there . It is much older camera. Also first camera combined together regular FED with fast lens. FED should be with shutter speed 1/1000.
JL Princelle, as he told me, not collector. He is writer.

Edited by - ilyast on Jun 08 2015 2:30:08 PM
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  2:21:58 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/862015__DSC0431.jpg

He is more interested in music than in cameras.
Go to Top of Page
SteveA
United Kingdom
134 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  2:29:38 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi, re. your Kiev. I have 481100 in my collection - comparing the details with Minouru Sasaki's photos in 'Contax to KNEB'..
The focussing wheel is a hybrid in that it has the circular grooving on the face, but no slot in the milled edge. 481244 is like this.
The accessory shoe has quite rounded edges, again like 481244 - most likely a Dresden Contax part. I can't see the focus mount clearly but if the 1,3 meter mark has a flat top 3 and separated from the 1 by a comma then it is a Dresden part. The lens serial number looks about right - 481739 has No 002923
Looks like it is worth of a good clean and restoration as it is quite a rarity.

Cheers,

Steve
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  2:29:47 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks Fred. I think the Fed with 50/2 was cheap, 70 euro is the price for the lens alone. The Zorki-1 not cheap but also not expensive, it depends on the condition. It's great if you are looking for things which are hard to find.
Go to Top of Page

Ulrich W.
uwittehh
Germany
837 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  2:50:10 PM  Show Profile  Visit uwittehh's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Nice finds! Especially the Kiev, even if it looks very hard used. But as Steve says, a nice cleaning and carefully restauration and you have a fine piece for collection.

Ulrich

http://fotos.cconin.de
Go to Top of Page

Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  3:57:06 PM  Show Profile  Visit Vlad's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Great to see such active discussion and long time members! Some nice finds Fred! Ilya, haha! Nice picture of Jean Loup! I hope you passed on my regards.

Cheers,
Vlad.
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  4:18:22 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

Ha, ha! JLP as a piper with a "Compare our prices" behind! Thanks Ilyast!
Concerning the Fed s/n 4184, Fred's is not a fake. Two possibilities: a replacement of a non working 1a by a 1b by the factory (under warranty), with the same s/n. We have some in the wiki. Or a mistake in the numbering: not impossible too. We have already discussed that matter.

Fred, all your purchases are bargains! The 1948 Kiev is particularly interesting, with these mix Dresden/Jena parts. Just don't restore it too much. But you do what you want, of course!

Tell me please when you have photos with your 0.95 Canon lens!

Amitiés. Jacques.
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  5:06:58 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Mistakes in numbers are very common. It is make sense. But any way it is not early version.

Edited by - ilyast on Jun 08 2015 5:08:19 PM
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  5:29:31 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
2 of my new toys
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/862015__DSC0993.JPG

Go to Top of Page

Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  7:09:15 PM  Show Profile  Visit Vlad's Homepage  Reply with Quote

Wow Ilya! Are these from Bievres? And what camera is that on the right??

Vlad
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  11:26:43 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
No. I can't find anything there. I just purchased there 3 old films, actually from JLP. But it is from the same trip. Trip was really productive. I find about 5-7 very rare cameras.
Second camera is Record 1.
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 08 2015 :  11:28:19 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ilyast

No. I can't find anything there. I just purchased there 3 old films, actually from JLP. But they are from the same trip. Trip was really productive. I find about 5-7 very rare cameras.
Second camera is Record 1.

Go to Top of Page

Juhani Halmeenmaki
cedricfan
Finland
1020 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 09 2015 :  12:48:13 AM  Show Profile  Visit cedricfan's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Fred_L

quote:
Originally posted by cedricfan

Wow, very nice cameras indeed!
I would love to know what is the real price level of such wonders in Bievres, but I am afraid that Fred will not share that information with us.

Best regards,
Juhani



Hi Juhani
I bought the fake Red Flag and #4186 for 300 euros. The Fed with 2/50mm for 70 euros. The Zorki 1 for 60 euros. and the Kiev for 200 euros. Canon 7 with 0.95, much more expensive...

Fred



Thank you, not that bad.
And my favourite is the Kiev

Best regards,
Juhani
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 09 2015 :  03:22:36 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ilyast

Mistakes in numbers are very common. It is make sense. But any way it is not early version.



Yes, Ilya. With such a vulcanite and a flat on the shutter button, it must be a last 1b. I have the same in the s/n 48xxx. And too the s/n 4580 with the same vulcanite.
If I remember, another hypothesis was a special engraving for a ministry or other....

OK with Juhani: I find too the Kiev is the most exciting!

Jacques.



Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 09 2015 :  04:09:51 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by cedricfan


And my favourite is the Kiev



I think very special is the Record because it's not mentioned on fotoua and sovietcams, but found it in the wiki here.
http://ussrphoto.com/Wiki/default.asp?WikiCatID=12&ParentID=1&ContentID=1301&Item=Record
Maybe we could add some photos.

This small box camera has 6 plates 4,5x6 cm which are changeable in a magazine.

Edited by - Lenny on Jun 09 2015 1:31:54 PM
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 09 2015 :  12:06:23 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'll do it later but you can find more info here
http://www.ussrcameras.ru/?rp=1&action=tovar&tovar_category=40&id=190
Also in Princelle book pg 27
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 09 2015 :  12:18:50 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
also
http://www.photohistory.ru/1209878295332607.html
http://fotoatelier.ru/dovoennaja-fototehnika/1578-fotokamera-rekord.html
http://fotocataloque.ru/history_soviet_cameras.html?start=8
http://fotocataloque.ru/1200-fotoapparatov-iz-sssr.html?start=367
Sorry most of them in russian
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 09 2015 :  1:29:36 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks Ilya,
the last link has also an inside picture, but maybe there is something missing. Hope your Record is complete. Would also be interesting to know how high and wide the box is because it looks really small. Is it made of wood or bakelite?
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 09 2015 :  3:36:18 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It is made from wood. and not big. I can make better pictures and measure it later this month when I'll be back to US.
Go to Top of Page

Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 09 2015 :  7:37:31 PM  Show Profile  Visit Vlad's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Ilya, amazing finds! Congratulations! I'm coming over to take some pictures of these wonders when you're back here in Chicago

Cheers,
Vlad.
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 10 2015 :  5:55:31 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Of course. Here is few more. Not all but ...
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1062015__DSC1235.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1062015__DSC1236.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1062015__DSC1238.JPG

Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 10 2015 :  6:01:45 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1062015__DSC1241.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1062015__DSC1242.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1062015__DSC1243.JPG

Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  01:55:41 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks for the photos Ilya,
a Leica without shoe? It must have been a Model-A before from 1928.
Fed-KMZ #00070 was in Aidas' hands before, I wonder how many owners this camera already had. Interesting that it has a leather case, never saw it before.
Fed-Zorki #00691, is it original, looks strange to me.
Fed-Zorki #04862, one of the last with 1/1000.
Many leather cases, was something inside or written on them. Please put a note inside so that the comibination with the camera won't get lost, or make photos to keep the combination.
Hope they all work.
Thanks Lenny

Edited by - Lenny on Jun 11 2015 02:12:26 AM
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  02:17:52 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Leica it is FED made for spy's
Yes you right for Aidas camera. It is the same. I assume everything real here.
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  03:44:23 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

There was no Leica without shoe, Lenny. Even the Leica 0. This Leica/Fed seems made with a Fed cover from the s/n c. 9000/10000, by the shape of the finder. With such a number, it should have a shoe.

We already have the Fed 1a s/n 05890 in our wiki with Juhani as owner.

Jacques.
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  03:56:56 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Well, I guess it's mine now.

Edited by - ilyast on Jun 11 2015 03:57:32 AM
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  04:18:19 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi Ilya,

Just try to understand.
You show here some very rare cameras. It's normal we try to find if we have a trace of them.

Anyway, it would be very kind if you could put other photos of your cameras...

I don't understand why you say that your Leica/Fed is "for spy"? There is no Leica without shoe...

Thanks for all these rarities! Jacques.
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  04:25:44 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi Jacques. I absolutely ok with that. I'm not offended. I will make better pictures when I'll be back to home. I still in France. Leica/FED made for Russian spy's to cover up FED.
Also I have much more rare cameras . I'll post pictures of them later.
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  04:32:18 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Jacques M.

There was no Leica without shoe, Lenny. Even the Leica 0. This Leica/Fed seems made with a Fed cover from the s/n c. 9000/10000, by the shape of the finder.



I thought of that Jacques and the logo looks little bit strange, but obviously with those 3 holes this cam had a special addition.
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  04:52:14 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ilyast

Hi Jacques. I absolutely ok with that. I'm not offended. I will make better pictures when I'll be back to home. I still in France. Leica/FED made for Russian spy's to cover up FED.
Also I have much more rare cameras . I'll post pictures of them later.



Ilya, I didn't intend to offend you, sorry if it sounded like that. You are one of the famous Fed-KMZ collectors now. I wonder who the other is of #00063, it was Alain Berry before. I think to know about the previous owners is part of their special history. Maybe Aidas can tell you where and when he got it from.

What I would do:
Check how much tension is on the curtains, it can be felt, the small screw inside the two-sided nuts. I would lower the tension if it's too much.
I would always keep the shutter cocked, it would rest the opening curtain and the closing curtain would be rolled on the much bigger drum which is much better for the curtain.

Thanks again
Lenny
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  05:08:31 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by ilyast

Leica/FED made for Russian spy's to cover up FED.



That's interesting and totally comprehensible. Fed faked their own Feds to become Leicas. Very special then.
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  05:12:57 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks. At some point this Leica FEd belong to JLP
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  07:40:25 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Congratulations also to Aidas, he must be rich now.
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  08:54:08 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Lenny

quote:
Originally posted by ilyast

Leica/FED made for Russian spy's to cover up FED.



That's interesting and totally comprehensible. Fed faked their own Feds to become Leicas. Very special then.



No Lenny. I don't think it is so simple. Not sure that the engraving was made at the factory. And there are errors in the text. And if it was really a fake for spy, there would be a a shoe, as on any Leica. the factory would not have made such flagrant mistakes.

But I will wait for a special thread to discuss all that when Ilya is at home! I have some Leica Feds too to compare with this one!

Jacques.
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  09:32:31 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Jacques M.

I don't think it is so simple. Not sure that the engraving was made at the factory. And there are errors in the text. And if it was really a fake for spy, there would be a a shoe, as on any Leica. the factory would not have made such flagrant mistakes.



Jacques, it must have been before the war, right. I'm not sure if people at that time knew about all the variants of Leicas. Maybe not for spys used to operate in Germany because the Gestapo could easily ask Leica. But good enough for spys in all other countries. Maybe these fakes were not intended to keep hidden, but the FED logo would easily be recognized as russian. So these fakes must not be very good copies, only we recognize strange things now.
Made from an early Fed this copy has it's worth, would be interesting to know more about it's history and where Princelle got it from.
Go to Top of Page
Ilya Stolyar
ilyast
USA
67 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  11:55:28 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I get this particular camera not from Aidas. Sorry this camera not make him rich.
Go to Top of Page

G.Franco Giordano
Francesco
Italy
35 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  2:51:18 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The fake FEDs/Leica were made only for a problem of patents.The were some people in USSR,(diplomats, journalists, traders)that for their job outside the USSR needed a camera.The soviets had FEDs, but they were a Leica copy, and not only the camera, but every single part of it was covered by a german patent.So those fake Leicas were made to avoid any problem with Germany, which was a very important commercial partner for USSR. German authorities knew very well what the soviets did, but they pretended know nothing because USSR was a closed market; anyway they couldn't sell their cameras in USSR. After the war there were many Leica copies from over the world because in the peace treaty was stated that every german patent existing before the war was not more valid. And USSR began to sell the Zorki abroad. Greetings Francesco
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 11 2015 :  4:27:33 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi Francesco, have you been to Bievres?

I thought before the war the Leica patents were not valid in Russia. I read that maybe in Princelle's books or in the Leica wikipedia. Germany had good connections with Russia, they shared technology. The german company Goerz which later became a part of Zeiss had a factory in Leningrad (St.Petersburg) from 1905 on. Luiz told us some time ago that the KMZ logo originated from the Goerz logo. If Leica didn't have patents in Russia sure Fed was allowed to built copies before the war and why shouldn't Russians use Feds in Germany then.
Go to Top of Page
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts
Posted - Jun 12 2015 :  03:41:13 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Yes, the historical background is very important, I think.
The treaty of Rapallo (1922) established a cooperation between Germany and the Soviet Union. If not, the decision of "making Leicas" in the Commune would not have been followed so fast by the real production of Feds.
Makarenko even relates in his memories that a German delegation had met a Fed one. And the Germans had left the new Leica (probably the III(F) or the III(G))on a table... which was dismounted and remounted by the Communards.

The different Leica cameras were well known by Fed. So, there should not be mistakes in a Leica fake made by Fed... The "general" opinion is that these fakes were made for money. Of course, that does not exclude a fake made illegally by a Communard...

I had already been astonished by this camera, years ago, when discovering it in the JLP. I am really happy to know more about it. Thanks, Ilya! And eager you are back home!

Amitiés. Jacques.

Edited by - Jacques M. on Jun 12 2015 03:44:50 AM
Go to Top of Page
Zoom
596 Posts
Posted - Jun 12 2015 :  4:17:12 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Lenny

Luiz told us some time ago that the KMZ logo originated from the Goerz logo.

At different times, C.P. Goerz with its affiliates used two logos (but just writing the name "C.P. Goerz" was the most preferred practice). The first one (triangle-like) became the NPZ logo, now in: Novosibirsk, it is the former "Zavod tochnoy mekhaniki" (Krasnogorsk). And the later logo (Dove prism) became the KMZ logo.
Some information of this history is there (in Russian):
http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-logos.html
http://www.zenitcamera.com/archive/history/marks.html
A separate page about a mysterious logos history (Goerz-NPZ-KMZ) is not ready yet. I still can not find the time to finish this work... :(

Edited by - Zoom on Jun 12 2015 5:13:55 PM
Go to Top of Page
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
2002 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Jun 12 2015 :  8:08:24 PM  Show Profile  Visit Luiz Paracampo's Homepage  Reply with Quote
very interesting history of logos idea
we wait for that
Regards
LP
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 13 2015 :  12:26:18 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Luiz Paracampo

very interesting history of logos idea
we wait for that



It could be said that Zeiss and KMZ are far relatives because of Goertz. Goertz produced mostly optical goods for the military and after World War One, which Germany lost, they were not allowed to build military goods anymore because of the peace treaty. Joining Zeiss saved the company. I assume the factory in Leningrad was lost, Russia won World War One and the Goertz factory might have become a Soviet company then. The machinery, tools and skilled workers must have been still there and a good start for something new. That KMZ chose the old Goertz logo shows how important the factory in Leningrad was in the Russian history.

Will be very interesting what Zoom can tell us about this logo.

Edited by - Lenny on Jun 13 2015 01:00:03 AM
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 13 2015 :  06:20:24 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi Fred,
just to let you know, there was a Canon 50/0.95 lens sold at westlicht auction for 2200 euro.
Go to Top of Page

Fred_L
France
226 Posts
Posted - Jun 13 2015 :  2:39:18 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hi Lenny!
Thank you for the information
I bought mine 1450 euros for body and lens in Bièvres.
It has taken me half a day to négociate with seller from Denmark.
He wanted 1990 at beginning...
Fred
Go to Top of Page
Lenny
496 Posts
Posted - Jun 13 2015 :  4:18:46 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Fred, page 6, lot 276, serial #16507, and 2200 euro was without buyers premium, now it's 2640 euro.
http://www.westlicht-auction.com/index.php?id=4

There was also a Neuca, not as beautiful as Jacques', page 5, lot 251, 6600 euro.


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1362015_Neuca proto westlicht 1506251.jpg
Go to Top of Page
Zoom
596 Posts
Posted - Jun 14 2015 :  3:46:44 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Lenny

... Russia won World War One ...

You are mistaken. Russia did not won that war. The WWI for Russia ended with the two Revolutions, the collapse of a state, a civil war, an intervention in 1918--1921 (which was attended: by the Germany (up to the end 1919), USA, GB with dominions: Australia, Canada..., and France, Italy, Poland, Greece, Romania, and Japan), etc. After that the country has been in a full blockade...

Edited by - Zoom on Jun 16 2015 03:10:06 AM
Go to Top of Page

G.Franco Giordano
Francesco
Italy
35 Posts
Posted - Jun 15 2015 :  03:16:45 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The aim of wester intervention in 1919-1921 was to cut from Russia the baltic, the easter europe and the caucasus; this to avoid that Russia could became a threaten to the new european states and to the middle east oil. Strangely this is exactly what they did in 1991.Sorry for the digression.Francesco

Edited by - Francesco on Jun 15 2015 03:23:50 AM
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
USSRPhoto.com Forums © USSRPhoto.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
Google