Topic
Topic author: cinasure
Posted on: 20090321032347
Reply author: cinasure
Replied on: 20090321032739
Reply author: Kievuser
Replied on: 20090321032910
cinasure posted this image on a Chinese forum. I recommended this forum to him(her?) as we have some experienced collectors here. I would also like to know the answer.:-)
Thanks,
zhang
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20090321034704
Hello!
Welcome!
About this camera, probably the engravings are a little too large, comparing with the two anniversary cameras I possess. Perhaps too we could say that all should be in red (and less new!)
But the main point is that this camera is a Fed 2b dating of 1956 or 1957. Really, we are far from 1967, the year of the 50th anniversary... The lens seems not to be a good one: it should be a white F410 26M prefixed "67", or a zebra F 421, always prefixed 67.
If it can help...
Amitiés. Jacques.
Reply author: cinasure
Replied on: 20090321040240
thanks a lot!!
we(zhang & me) are also suspicious of the serial no. that range of "fed-2 (b) 1956-1958 #095.000-#475.000"...
but this logo is so lovely indeed.....
thanks again..
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20090321083451
I forgot...
Another main thing is that this engraving can be observed only on Fed 3b and 4b. As far as I know! [:)]
Amitiés. Jacques.
Reply author: dee
Replied on: 20090321182935
If it isn't expensive - just buy for style !
dee
Reply author: cinasure
Replied on: 20090322041748
dear all:
i bought this body recently。i'm really comfused by this logo.
Of cos it was said 5ОктÑбрь never been engraved on FED2. but i saw this exquisite engraving seeming not a handwork.
maybe it's a mysterious type or made by an expert DIYer.
However this one is very very intersting and rarity, isn't it?
thanks
cinasure
Reply author: mermoz37
Replied on: 20090323052624
" but i saw this exquisite engraving seeming not a handwork. "
no, no...you know it is very easy to engrave like this ...that is the reason it is so thick drawing ( like also on camera serial number and "fed" name)
I agree whith jacques and even I possess some fakes whith that kind of writing , so large in lines)
alain
Reply author: Kievuser
Replied on: 20090323072144
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by mermoz37</i>
<br />" but i saw this exquisite engraving seeming not a handwork. "
no, no...you know it is very easy to engrave like this ...that is the reason it is so thick drawing ( like also on camera serial number and "fed" name)
I agree whith jacques and even I possess some fakes whith that kind of writing , so large in lines)
alain
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Now I recall that I have seen some fake Leicas with very fine engravings like this. So it would not be very difficult to do with a Fed-2.[:)]

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/44.jpg
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/44.jpgZhang
Reply author: mermoz37
Replied on: 20090323140738
I agree ...even if the forger use a laser cut or laser grind machine....so common now.