Vostok
Printed from: USSRPhoto Forums
Topic URL: http://localhost:8088/modern/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1286
Printed on: 6/9/2026 5:03:17 AM
Topic
Topic author: Vlad
Posted on: 20090709194201
Replies
Reply author: nightphoto
Replied on: 20090709201551
Reply author: Vlad
Replied on: 20090709213607
Thank you Bill for posting it! Yea I figured that it was not an original configuration just wanted to make sure...
Vlad
Reply author: Luiz Paracampo
Replied on: 20090710104324
Reply author: Zoom
Replied on: 20090718173845
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Luiz Paracampo</i>
<br />The logo is still used by Novosibirsky Pribori Zavod...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
You may see this logo (and the real plant name) there:
http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-logos.html#npzAbout "Vostok" origin: I don't know who first wrote about "an aviation factory in Tashkent, Uzbekistan"... We must see "Bulletin of the RCCC (C96)" (according J.L. Princelle), but David Tomlinson... you know... :(
Of course, this camera produser was NPZ.
Reply author: nightphoto
Replied on: 20090718200216
Since Vostok seems to have been made in the years just after World War II, I suspect that possibly the factory NPZ was making aviation instruments or parts during the war, and this is where the information came from. At that time (during the war) probably most factories that had higher technical capability were manufacturing parts for planes, tanks, weapons, and related items or accessories. So, if this is correct about NPZ, and they were making some aviation parts during the war, it might be possible (although not strictly correct) to call the factory an aviation factory ... just in the same way it might be possible to have called Arsenal or LOMO a "camera factory" even though that is just part of their factory and production.
That being said, however... Tashkent is certainly not Novosibirsk! Thanks for the information Zoom!
Can someone tell me the exact English translation for the name of the factory, NPZ ? Is it Novosibirsky Pribori Zavod?
Regards, Bill
Reply author: RCCCUK
Replied on: 20090719064432
I was given the information about the Vostok being produced in Tashkent about ten years ago by a serious Moscow collector. Although I have visited Tashkent, and I found that there was a factory producing aircraft equipment, I could not get any confirmation that the Vostok was manufactured there.
The NPZ logo does not seem to be quite the same as the Vostok logo. Has anyone had confirmation from NPZ that they did manufacture the Vostok?
David(http://www.rcccuk.com)
Reply author: nightphoto
Replied on: 20090719130613
David,
I agree that the logo is not exactly the same as the NPZ logo shown on the NPZ website, but it does look the same as the top version shown on the Zenit website, although I don't know where the Zenit website got those two variations.
I have just sent an e-mail to the NPZ factory with a photo of my Vostok, asking if they are the maker of the camera. I will post a reply if one comes to me.
Regards, Bill
Reply author: Luiz Paracampo
Replied on: 20090719142025
Can someone tell me the exact English translation for the name of the factory, NPZ ? Is it Novosibirsky Pribori Zavod?
<b>Novosibirsk Instrument Factory</b>
Novosibirsky=New Siberian.
LP
Reply author: RCCCUK
Replied on: 20090720014424
Reply author: nightphoto
Replied on: 20090720112010
Thanks for putting up the scans of the passport David. I did not receive anything in the way of paperwork with my camera when I bought it, so this is very interesting.
It seems that the camera is called "Universal Photo Camera" or "UFK" on the passport! But, Ican not accurately read the rest of the passport to see if the factory name is there.
Regards, Bill
Reply author: Zoom
Replied on: 20090720173937
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by RCCCUK</i>
<br />I was given the information about the Vostok being produced in Tashkent about ten years ago by a serious Moscow collector.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Sorry, this is the mistake.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by RCCCUK</i>
The NPZ logo does not seem to be quite the same as the Vostok logo.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
This is the plant No. 69 logo.
After the War this plant was known as NPZ == Novosibirskiy priborostroitel'niy zavod.
Reply author: Vlad
Replied on: 20090720193629
Reply author: RCCCUK
Replied on: 20090721030315
The evidence so far convinces me that the Vostok was indeed manufactured by NPZ. I will alter my Wiki entry accordingly. Thanks for all your help.
David
(http://www.rcccuk.com)
Reply author: RCCCUK
Replied on: 20100207042551
After quite some time, the origin of the Vostok raises its head again with the entry in the book "1200 Cameras from the USSR", page 586/7. The item states that the Vostok is from an aviation factoty in the name of Ukalova, Tashkent.
David
(http://www.rcccuk.com)
Reply author: Zoom
Replied on: 20100207172901
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by RCCCUK</i>
<br />After quite some time, the origin of the Vostok raises its head again with the entry in the book "1200 Cameras from the USSR", page 586/7. The item states that the Vostok is from an aviation factoty in the name of Ukalova, Tashkent.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Because this error was published in J.P. Princelle book: page 243 (2nd edition).
Because this error was published in your Bulletin of the RCCC (C96).
Please, publish this article there...
Reply author: RCCCUK
Replied on: 20100208023403
Hi Zoom,
Thanks for your interest. What you say is true, but neither J. P. Princelle or I named a factory (Zavod im Ukalova). My information originated from a collector in Moscow (unfortunately I can't remember his name - it may have been Alexander Kamynin). Do you have any information on this factory (Zavod im Ukalova) or is there any evidence that Plant 69 (NPZ) actually manufactured the Vostok?
David
(http://www.rcccuk.com)
Reply author: Zoom
Replied on: 20100208083755
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by RCCCUK</i>
<br />My information originated from a collector in Moscow (unfortunately I can't remember his name - it may have been Alexander Kamynin).
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Thank you. Now it is clear, who had misled all of you.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by RCCCUK</i>
<br />... is there any evidence that Plant 69 (NPZ) actually manufactured the Vostok?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
See this logo:

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/2072009_Vostok%20pp1.jpg
Than see this page:
http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-logos.html#npzIt is simple... ;)
P.S.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by RCCCUK</i>
<br />Zavod im Ukalova<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
"Zavod imeni Chkalova" ("Çàâîä èìåíè ×êàëîâà"). Who is this Chkalov see there:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valery_ChkalovAbout that plant see this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tashkent_Aviation_Production_Association
Reply author: RCCCUK
Replied on: 20100209023713
Many thanks Zoom,
Your references and comments were very helpful. I think that we can all now agree on the origins of the Vostok. I was probably the last person to have doubts!
David
(http://www.rcccuk.com)
Reply author: nightphoto
Replied on: 20100209102810
I think it would be a good idea to update our own WIKI to reflect the correct facts of origin and also to start entering serial numbers and dates of known examples. I have one and will enter the data for it later today.
Regards, Bill
Reply author: mermoz37
Replied on: 20100209134501
I have one too [:)] ready to tell you, my data as Bill suggest
alain
Reply author: nightphoto
Replied on: 20100210231551
OK Alain, we have made a data base for Vostok so you can add your information. And anyone else who has it also!
Regards, Bill
Reply author: mermoz37
Replied on: 20100211104002
mine is 1948 but no passport , no serial number . Only lense show number: 481498 - Industar 51 (4.5/ 21 cm)
brown belows.
Reply author: mermoz37
Replied on: 20100211105537
In fact, ther is a serial number but delete for some reason....hard to see something but whith a lupe I can read "N0?7?" (may be 5).
just note : mine is slightly different ...
I have to show you pictures , soon.
Alain
Reply author: mermoz37
Replied on: 20100213050848