ZK lens
Printed from: USSRPhoto Forums
Topic URL: http://localhost:8088/modern/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1473
Printed on: 5/31/2026 2:21:23 AM
Topic
Topic author: AlexanderK
Posted on: 20100109175052
Replies
Reply author: RCCCUK
Replied on: 20100110045000
Hi Alexander,
The rigid 39mm screw mount version of the ZK seems to be rarer than the Kiev/Contax mount version. I have two versions of this lens with Kiev/Contax mount. One is a ZK of 1948 #000378 and the other is a ZK Zorki of 1949 #4903170. I also have a collapsible ZK Zorki 39mm screw mount lens of 1950 # 5001949. I do not know if the serial numbers are specific to the mount type, or whether all f/2 5cm lenses had one series of numbers. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of these lenses can let us know.
David
(http://www.rcccuk.com)
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100116155146
I've got almost the same lens with the same mount but in Carl Zeis Jena 2687429 T... thought at first that was an industar 26 mount with a sonnar barrel and glass.
I would be very interested to see the back of the mount... and if possible the zeiss serial number that is hidden in this lens...
Stephan
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100116174619
to see that... just take the back part of the lens out and look for a 6digit number...
Stephan
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100117143141
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100117143401
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100117143652
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20100117152214
Hi Stephan!
Fine to see you back!
The smell of Zeiss's lenses...
In fact, I agree: it would be interesting to know more about the back of Alexander's ZK.
Amitiés. Jacques.
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100117152957
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100117153615
Reply author: AlexanderK
Replied on: 20100119124606
Hello Stephan,
Hello Jacques,
I have took out the back ring, but I have not found any number [:(]. What do I do wrong?
Regards, Alexander
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100119140328
ok... you have to take out the back part of the lens... with a spanner wrench (you have two black rings inside the rangefinder cam)... normally it comes out easily...
if you look at the picture of the zeiss lens just above... it's the black rimmed part with two grips for the spanner wrench... nothing hard... on my lenses it comes out easily with the rim only...
Stephan
Stephan
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100119140855
Reply author: Kievuser
Replied on: 20100120004432
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100120121655
what lens is on the left ? it's the same mount as mine...
Stephan
Reply author: Kievuser
Replied on: 20100120193003
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by stephanvdz</i>
<br />what lens is on the left ? it's the same mount as mine...
Stephan
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
On the left is a 1955 Jupiter-8. Pleas check #bay item:320467005850 a ZK lens has the same mount as the one on the right.
Zhang
Reply author: AlexanderK
Replied on: 20100121145925
My lens has the mount as on the right lens. It is not easy to disassemble this lens, so I would try it first on my old Jupiter-8 with the same mount. [:)]
Regards, Alexander
Reply author: stephanvdz
Replied on: 20100121154715
you need a spanner wrench to unscrew the back block of the lens... easy... but precise... it's never hardly screwed...
S.
Stephan
Reply author: RCCCUK
Replied on: 20100322085003
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20100324093027
Hi David,
Certainly you are right, or your lens is an exception.
After my datas:
- there is no 1951 2/50 ZK lens,
- all the 2/50 ZK lenses have "ears" at the diaphragm ring,
- last known ZK 2/50: serial number 5005206 (Zhang datas). First known Jupiter 8: serial # 5005386 (my collection, on a 1950 Kiev II), with ears too.
Perhaps it would be useful to put that in the wiki, as the 1950 year is a transition for ZK and Jupiter lenses.
Amitiés. Jacques.
Reply author: AidasCams
Replied on: 20100325095824
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20100325102824
Hi Aidas,
I think there are some interesting differences between the two 1951 2/50 ZK lenses: yours and David's...
Anyway, a genuine 1951 ZK would be a novelty (for me!). But no doubt KMZ could have found some old parts in their boards! It would not be the first time...
I have just checked my datas: all these lenses (the 1950 and 1951 ones) have 7 ciphers, not 6 ?...
Amitiés. Jacques.