Back to topic

FED 4,5/28 lens without s/n

Printed from: USSRPhoto Forums

Topic URL: http://localhost:8088/modern/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1485

Printed on: 5/12/2026 2:14:59 AM


Topic

Topic author: AlexanderK

Posted on: 20100117084347

Hello,
here is my nice FED 4,5/28 lens. What I find a little strange, that there is no s/n on the back of the lens. Any comments?

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1712010_FED_008.jpg


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1712010_FED_008.jpg

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1712010_FED_007.jpg


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1712010_FED_007.jpg

... and some more FED lens from my collection. I have just registered them in Wiki-Catalog.

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1712010_FED_006.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1712010_FED_006.JPG



Regards, Alexander

Replies

Reply author: Jacques M.

Replied on: 20100117112328


Hi Alexander,
No real explanation to propose... I have too a pre war Fed lens without number.
Perhaps an omission? A "communard" who put the lens in his pocket before it was numbered?

Amitiés. Jacques.
PS: as you know, the serial number should be 4xxxx.

Reply author: okynek

Replied on: 20100117120728

<quote>A "communard" who put the lens in his pocket before it was numbered?</quote>
I like this explanation [:)] Very much possible.
Brave Communar ! He/She most likely be kill if caught [:(]

Reply author: Vlad

Replied on: 20100117121809

Honestly I just think that at that point in time when all these early lenses were produced the production has not been very strict in terms of process and I don't think they cared much if one or two lenses got skipped on engraving the number.. I tend to agree with Jacques that it's just simply an omission due to lack of strict assembly line rules.. those were kids after all as mind boggling as it seems by looking at the complexity of the optics..

Vlad