Back to topic

Jupiter-3 on the M Monochrom

Printed from: USSRPhoto Forums

Topic URL: http://localhost:8088/modern/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2272

Printed on: 5/11/2026 3:11:23 PM


Topic

Topic author: Brian

Posted on: 20121229104134

New camera, first Monochrome Digital camera made in 12 years. And the first new Monochrome Digital Camera that I have bought in 20 years. Told that to Josh of Dale Photo when I bought the camera.

First lens on the new camera HAD to be my favorite Jupiter-3, from 1950.
At F1.5, Red Filter

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8492/8298291827_2a296a4324_c.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8217/8298291245_01456329a9_c.jpg



At F4

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8223/8299343184_cca7532fd6_c.jpg



http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8360/8298290599_e9ca89cb03_c.jpg

Replies

Reply author: Jacques M.

Replied on: 20121229110720

Hi Brian!

I don't know what a monochrom digital camera is (or just a faint idea) but the 1950 Jupiter... Zeiss glasses, probably?
Astonishing!

Jacques.

Reply author: Brian

Replied on: 20121229160229

The Jupiter-3: Zeiss Glass, and a Zeiss SN on the rear fixture. This lens looks like it had never been used: the focal length was wrong, and it was held into the Contax mount with sewing thread. There was no shim, and it front-focused terribly. I set the focal length for the Leica, and moved it into a Leica mount. Focus is perfect at f1.5 across the entire range.

Reply author: stephanvdz

Replied on: 20121230153221

wow... i like those BW, but the M monochrome is out of reach for me... sadly

Stephan

Reply author: Brian

Replied on: 20130102184041

It's an expensive camera, no doubt. I let the camera collection pay for this one, about half of it from selling lenses accumulated before the age of digital.

Reply author: womble

Replied on: 20130103160930

Lovely results from that combination. I'd be tempted by the Monochrom if I ever win the lottery...!

K.

Reply author: Brian

Replied on: 20130317144840

http://g3.img-dpreview.com/4904EB8AF909432A9F07572B155022C6.jpg




I took three Sonnars to the Marine Museum in Quantico, Virginia: A 1936 Carl Zeiss Jena 5cm F1.5 (Factory coated, converted to Leica mount), an early Nikkor-SC 5cm F1.4, and the 1950 Jupiter-3.

All shots wide-open, on the M Monochrom.

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/876628771/albums/jupiter-3-1936-sonnar-nikkor-5cm-f1-4

To my eyes- the 1950 Jupiter-3 has higher contrast, sharper, and less field curvature. The lens was originally in Contax/Kiev mount but did not focus correctly, and the mount prevented it from being properly shimmed. I moved it to a Leica thread mount. This one is special: I changed the position of the rear triplet four times to minimize field curvature, changing the main shim each time. I'm going to experiment with a second J-3 for this.

This is my favorite lens on the new camera.

Reply author: Jacques M.

Replied on: 20130318050629


Thanks for this comparison, Brian.
Finally, these lenses seem very close: all is probably more a question of shim and regulation of the body than a problem of quality, no?

A pity that the prices of the Jup 3 keep on increasing...

Amitiés. Jacques.

Reply author: Brian

Replied on: 20130319192202

I have two J-3's on the way in, one will be used to convert a Sonnar to Leica mount "on request".

The other is going to get a perfect-glass 1956 KMZ optics module in it. I've been buying J-3's with broken filter rings, scratched glass, etc- and "upgrading" them. Days of $50 J-3's are over, but they are getting the respect that they deserve.

Reply author: uwittehh

Replied on: 20130321172102

Brian,

the shots are great! They make fun to use my "new" J-3 from 1951 which is originally a coatet 1943 Sonnar :-)

Ulrich

http://fotos.cconin.de