Topic
Topic author: S.H.
Posted on: 20130226043843
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20130226070153
Hello SH!
Welcome...
About your question, I would say earlier: probably 1948 or 1949.
The first ones were mounted at the same time on Fed-Zorkis and early Kievs before they were reversed.
Quite a rare finder. And perfectly usable!
Amitiés. Jacques.
Reply author: S.H.
Replied on: 20130226135240
Thank you.
You are right, it is very usable. the exterior is well worn but the finder is very clear.
What intrigues me is the "Made in USSR" marking. That means it was for export, and I did not know about any camera exported from USSR before 1950.
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20130226145253
Yes. It would be the first turret I have seen with such an inscription... But I don't know well the history of these finders.
At the same period, some Feds were faked into Leica II to get currency. So, why not try to export a very good multi finder that Zeiss was unable to produce?
The first export Kiev II, with double engravings, are from 1950. Very early too.
Jacques.
Reply author: uwittehh
Replied on: 20130226161948
My earliest one in the original direction has serial number 003148 and no engravings "Made in USSR" but has a KMZ logo.
I also have an odd Finder which seems to be made for a FED-Zorki. looks nice, but I don't know if it is real, see <http://fotos.cconin.de/kameras/zorki1.htm> the sixth picture.
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de
Reply author: S.H.
Replied on: 20130227045546
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20130227054851
This one is younger than yours by the serial number. Nevertheless, it always have the "tomb" without arrow and the Zorki logo rather the KMZ one. Made for Fed-KMZ and Fed-Zorkis?
http://www.dvdtechcameras.com/lens/leica/47/47.htmBut I agree with you: it would not be convincing to fake such a costless item...
Yours is interesting too, Ulrich. The painting is the same as on the "real" Zorki shutterboxes after the Fed era. A crisp painting?
Amitiés. Jacques.
Reply author: uwittehh
Replied on: 20130303151246
Jacques,
the painting looks new, so I think it is not real. But it looks nice made :-)
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de