Topic
Topic author: okynek
Posted on: 20071210224816
Reply author: cedricfan
Replied on: 20071210232838
Reply author: okynek
Replied on: 20071211091354
Well, my is black, and your seems to have shiny firs ring. [;)]
Reply author: AidasCams
Replied on: 20071211095709
Well, I have already noticed that many of my Vega-3 lenses (i have at least 7 pieces) looks different. So, may be good start for the new collecting ... [:)]
Reply author: Kievuser
Replied on: 20071211103818
Are these for 135 rangefinder cameras, or for cine cameras? I thought these for cine cameras. I saw an I-50 cine version, but I did not buy it.
Reply author: okynek
Replied on: 20071211130827
This lens only good for 3 types of camera: Zenit 4, Zenit 5 and Zenit 6. I have one Vega-3 adopted for Zenit 3 using home-made adapter ring. But this construction does not work to good. Plus "author" of such creation had to kill aperture mechanic to get lens to work.
Reply author: Luiz Paracampo
Replied on: 20071211192539
Vlad
Obesrve
The lens Nº01912 and lens Nº11243 are really the same. The first one lost its chrome attached focusing ring a commom find with those lenses. Note the difficult hand catching in focusing. Ok the engravings are different but they are from different batches. If you go to Helios 44 one will see each batch with totally different parts. This is done to tooling tunings when starting each production series.
Reply author: okynek
Replied on: 20071211212020
I have to say they are really different. The 01912 has plastic handle for aperture and 11243 has metal ring. It better shown on second picture. The 01912 is on bottom right. It hard to see it numbers. But no matter, so many variations for less then 20.000 cameras made? You can not say this about 3+ mill Helios 44 for Zenit E .
Reply author: Kievuser
Replied on: 20071212061128
These four lenses are not the same. My Zenit 5 has a Vega-3 s/n 09980 that is the same as 01912. Which version is less often seen?