Back to topic

Helios 40 (39mm chrome)

Printed from: USSRPhoto Forums

Topic URL: http://localhost:8088/modern/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=786

Printed on: 5/13/2026 9:29:22 AM


Topic

Topic author: stephanvdz

Posted on: 20080724170032

hi all...

got an Helios 40 (39mm) with the serial number 000175...
and the original bill

who could tell me how much was 95,0 (or was it 950?) roubles in 1958... in terms of labor, valuta...?

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/helios 2.jpg


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/helios 2.jpg

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/mode d'emploi helios.jpg


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/mode d'emploi helios.jpg

http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/facture helios.jpg


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/facture helios.jpg



Stephan

Replies

Reply author: Kievuser

Replied on: 20080725005210

Hi Stephan,

In 1958, the average monthly salary of Soviet employees was 77.8 rubles, and the minimum salary between 1956-1960 was 27-35 rubles.:-) 1 kilograme flour(1st grade) cost 0.31 ruble , and 1 kilograme beef(1st grade) cost 1.5 ruble in 1959.

Reply author: stephanvdz

Replied on: 20080725034541

I hope the bill say 95,0 and not 950...

Stephan

Reply author: Zoom

Replied on: 20080725055733

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by stephanvdz</i>
<br />I hope the bill say 95,0 and not 950...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
This price is written correctly. Kievuser forgot, that in 1961 there was a denomination... ;)

Reply author: Kievuser

Replied on: 20080725071844

<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Zoom</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="MS Trebuchet, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by stephanvdz</i>
<br />I hope the bill say 95,0 and not 950...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
This price is written correctly. Kievuser forgot, that in 1961 there was a denomination... ;)
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

My father said that he paid 900 rubles for a Zorki-2C in 1956 in Moscow.:-)

Reply author: stephanvdz

Replied on: 20080725102631

then it's probably 950 roubles... meaning quite expensive

Stephan

Reply author: AidasCams

Replied on: 20080725104245

Both Zhang and Zoom are correct indeed, only Zhang have converted the average monthly sallary to denominated value already.


Best Regards,
Aidas

Reply author: stephanvdz

Replied on: 20080725150628

meaning that the lens did cost more than an average monthly wage...

which is almost normal (a ZI 85mm/2 today costs far more than a month wage in the EU)

Stephan

Reply author: okynek

Replied on: 20080725222505

Talking about price we forgot to congratulate Stephan with such great find!
Really nice serial number! [^]