Back to topic

Where to find some shims for FED 1?

Printed from: USSRPhoto Forums

Topic URL: http://localhost:8088/modern/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=819

Printed on: 5/31/2026 5:57:42 PM


Topic

Topic author: Gelios

Posted on: 20080812080941

Hello all,

Kids are away on vacation, so I have some time to spend rebuilding several FED 1 cameras....

I am currently standardizing the register distances and I need some shims to complete the work.

Do you know where I could find some or do you have another convenient solution?

[8D] Thanks! [8D]

Replies

Reply author: dgillette4

Replied on: 20080812092034

Most of the shims I see are paper, Personally I think brass shim stock if thin enough would be better, try hobby shops or arts and crafts. Just as long as you arrive at the proper flange to fp distance it would be fine. But just for sure I would run a test roll with the 1.5 lense opened up at various distances from one meter to inf. There is a site called the (fed survival site) with the proper specs. I think it is 28.8mm but make sure. There should be a link from Vlads site here. While it's apart check the rf setting. Good luck and let me know how you make out..Don

ZORKIE'S Survive

Reply author: Jacques M.

Replied on: 20080812094132


Hello Nicolas,

I agree with Don: the more convenient is paper in several layings if necessary to obtain the 28,8mm which are indispensable between the lens rim and the film.
But for prewar Fed 1-s, bodies and lenses were regulated together one by one at the factory. So, it can be much more complex as the regulation doesn't concern the body only, but the lens too...

I never tried to do that by myself: I asked a specialist!

Amitiés. Jacques.

Reply author: Gelios

Replied on: 20080812095213

Yes Don, I need also to check the RF setting (the funny part...).[xx(]

Jacques, I should use these pre-war cameras with post-war lenses (Industar 22, Industar 50 or Jupiter 8). So bodies should be set with 28.80mm distance (assuming that post-war lenses follows Leica standards...).

Reply author: dgillette4

Replied on: 20080812103229

[:D][:D] Does yur camera have a small hole in the back of the body? If so this is the way they checked focus. I'm getting my one and twos mixed up...he he. Or maybe flash sync...Don't know if a hakosyn would work on them.

ZORKIE'S Survive

Reply author: Jacques M.

Replied on: 20080812105627



There was a hole made in the back of one of my Fed S 1d to regulate all that (no hole after c. # 11500).
Once the job done, the owner filled it again! [:D]

Jacques.

Reply author: Luiz Paracampo

Replied on: 20080812171245

Nicolas
Pay attention.
You have two ways to follow:
First is mantain the originality of the camera.
Second is standartize the camera.
When doing that, you will loose original lens this cannot be replaced or used on the camera.
The correct standartizing will need a replacement of the mounting screw ring that attaches the lens on the camera. FED cameras made up to 1939 have not the winding screws standartized, placing a lens from another camera could put it upside down or in any other position.
So you need to prepare a new mounting ring for the new purposes, or use one from a newer useless FED, Zorki or Zenit cameras .
With a precision vernier the front flange must go to the film plane at exact 28.8mm
If you really want to go ahead I can assist you in this interesting and fascinating task.
Regards
LP
Note: Precision copper or aluminium foils can be obtained at jeweller makers shops.

Reply author: dgillette4

Replied on: 20080812185506

[:)]Thanks Luiz , originality would be of prime interest for me also. Don

ZORKIE'S Survive

Reply author: James McGee

Replied on: 20080812222036

Hello everyone,
All I can say is that the combined intimate detailed knowledge that you guys have between you of how to repair and maintain these lovely old cameras just knocks me out! Absolutely amazing!
Best wishes Jim.[:)][:)][:)]

Reply author: Gelios

Replied on: 20080813075428

Luiz, the best would be to keep the camera as it is, hoping the lens to be the original one (after all these years...). But the most convenient for me is to set it at the Leica standard (28.80mm loaded). As you wrote, it raise another issue: are new lenses going to be on the right position once screwed? If I remember well, I have only one camera with such real trouble.

For the flange measure, I have a depth gauge which is perfect for that task. When light is correctly oriented, it is fairly easy to see when the gauge tip touches the film surface. I have to make several measurements with various orientations of the gauge base to check that the mont ring is parallel to the film plane. This is very time consuming! [xx(][xx(][xx(]







Reply author: Luiz Paracampo

Replied on: 20080813160000

Nicholas
Some time ago I was thinking in making a wide angle and a short telephoto specially made for such cameras.
What do you find about this idea?
regards
LP

Reply author: Gelios

Replied on: 20080814080958

Luiz, please develop... There are already some wide angle and tele lenses for these cameras... What is your goal?

Reply author: Luiz Paracampo

Replied on: 20080814181656

Nicholas
The idea was to built low priced lenses but good performers and in the same time very dependable, that is, you will have a good lens for at least the next three or four generations.
The set should be a fixed focus wide angle glass lens with f/8 25mm focal length and a focusing f/5.6 80mm similar to FED 100mm with zone focusing.
The set in a case with two finders with spare for the camera body and normal lens would not exceed the 50 dollars range when series produced.
Any suggestions which would not increase the producing costs will bve well received.
Regards
LP