Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


 All Forums
 General Discussion
 Collectors and Users Open Forum
 Panoramic conversion on FED stereo
 New Topic
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo

Brazil
1981 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  08:56:48 AM  Show Profile  Visit Luiz Paracampo's Homepage  Reply with Quote
This is again from the collection Mr. Walter Dubronner. The camera was made from the body of a Russian FED stereocamera. The 47mm Scneider Super-Angulon is fixed on a unit to focus from 3 meter to infinity. The negative size is an astonishing 24x93 mm !!!!

For viewing such long panoramic slides Mr. Dubronner uses special frames (40x110 mm) and a special slide projector. The scanned negatives can be projected with a high quality beamer on a 4 Meter screen For exhibition he uses prints in different formats like 20 x 60 cm and up to 60 cm x200 cm.

Thank Mr. Dubronner very much for providing the details of this camera.
See
http://somakray.blogspot.com.br/2010/01/panoramic-conversion-of-fed.html


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/3042012_FED PANORAMA1.png




http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/3042012_FED PANORAMA2.png


Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4247 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  09:12:33 AM  Show Profile  Visit Vlad's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Wow! how is this possible with 47mm??! Is that enough coverage for such wide negative?

Luiz, thanks for posting!
Vlad.
Go to Top of Page

Guido Studer
Guido
Switzerland
362 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  11:18:05 AM  Show Profile  Visit Guido's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Hello Vlad

This must be a lens for medium format (ie. "6x9", 60x90mm) and a focal length of 47mm is a super wide lens on this format. The 47mm lens correspond to a 21mm lens on a "full frame" (24x36mm) camera. So the 20mm finder from KMZ is a good choice.

The angle of view for 24x93mm with a 47mm lens is 29° vertical and 89° horizontal by the way.

Best wishes - Guido
Go to Top of Page

Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4247 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  12:17:55 PM  Show Profile  Visit Vlad's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Hi Guido,

I see! Thanks for the explanation, but wouldn't a camera like this produce a lot of distortion? I'd be curious to the the resulting picture.

Cheers,
Vlad.
Go to Top of Page

Guido Studer
Guido
Switzerland
362 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  12:40:14 PM  Show Profile  Visit Guido's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Hello Vlad

The degree of distortion depends only of the lens, not of the specific camera. Every (super) wide lens produce some sort of distortion. This is a question of the projection.

Best wishes - Guido
Go to Top of Page
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1981 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  3:46:28 PM  Show Profile  Visit Luiz Paracampo's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Every lens produces a round image! Remember lenses are part of a Sphere ... The rectangular picture shape should be any one once inscript in the circular image area...
Regards
LP
Go to Top of Page
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1981 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  4:55:16 PM  Show Profile  Visit Luiz Paracampo's Homepage  Reply with Quote
This same lens was standard on Brooks Plaubel Verywide os 1957
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/vw100.htm

And the second model model of 1970
http://www.chinaphotography.com/forum/thread-76104-1-233.html

An exact duplicate of the lused lens can be seen at:
http://www.rockycameras.com/schneider-super-angulon-f8-47mm-wide-angle-lens-14999-7526-p.asp

A comparison made between Super Angulon ans Russar MR2 can be seen on the following picture: both are based on the the same formula:


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/3042012_russar superangulon.png

Go to Top of Page

Guido Studer
Guido
Switzerland
362 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  4:56:10 PM  Show Profile  Visit Guido's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Hello Luiz

You are absolutly right on this point. The term "distortion" is used in some different way's in photography. The distortion that I think Vlad had asked for is a normal effect of the spheric projection mostly seen on wide angle pictures. The other distortion is a fault of lens design that make straight lines bent (sorry, I don't know a better word).

Best wishes - Guido
Go to Top of Page
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1981 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  5:11:53 PM  Show Profile  Visit Luiz Paracampo's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Really Guido
Distortion is vague term once it means nothing with an adjective.
the distortion could be:
Barrel distortion once lens gives a perfet square as a barrel (as the name implies)
Pin cushion distortion alo the same in inverse sense
Stigmatism when distortion is preponderant in one direction
Saggital if there is done in tangents of the circle or in the circle but not in the rays of them
Radial if there is done in the rays of the circle but not in the circles themselves
Horizontal or vertical or diagonal when done in a single direction
Aleatory or Randomical whhen it occurrs in an insulated area of the picture

A very interesting lens was made by british opticians around 1938
called "The Distortograph" made for movies when persons bedame monsters in a similar way are now used by graphic computation.
Regards
LP
Go to Top of Page
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1981 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  5:15:50 PM  Show Profile  Visit Luiz Paracampo's Homepage  Reply with Quote
About Distortograph:
Correcting--year 19331:

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/1138731
Go to Top of Page
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1981 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  5:18:53 PM  Show Profile  Visit Luiz Paracampo's Homepage  Reply with Quote
A full text with pictures could be seen on the "British Photographic Almanack" of the era.
Go to Top of Page

Guido Studer
Guido
Switzerland
362 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  5:24:51 PM  Show Profile  Visit Guido's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Hello Luiz

Yes, the Super-Angulon and the Russar MR-2 (and also the Orion-15) are variants of the symetric double Gauss lens types.

Best wishes - Guido
Go to Top of Page

Guido Studer
Guido
Switzerland
362 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  5:30:24 PM  Show Profile  Visit Guido's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Hello Luiz

quote:
Originally posted by Luiz Paracampo

Distortion is vague term once it means nothing with an adjective.
the distortion could be:
...



Thanks for this full list of different distorion types and the interesting links.

Best wishes - Guido
Go to Top of Page
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
1981 Posts
My Collection

Posted - Apr 30 2012 :  7:19:56 PM  Show Profile  Visit Luiz Paracampo's Homepage  Reply with Quote
An interesting version of the 47mm Super Angulon can be seen in the prototype of the Hasselblad SWC Shift predecessor of the Arc body
see
http://www.marcocavina.com/articoli_fotografici/swc_shift/01_pag.htm

Regards
LP
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
USSRPhoto.com Forums © USSRPhoto.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
Google