| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Sangetsu |
Posted - Feb 28 2010 : 01:01:57 AM
I finally bought one today. After a good run selling my old gear on ebay last week, I decided to go shopping around the used-camera shops and junk stores. I ended up buying 5 cameras, one of which was a FED-1948-Zorki. I ended up paying $48 for it.
The camera is functional, and seems to be in decent condition. The shutter curtains don't look great, but I'll run a roll of film through it anyway while I wait for the new curtains I ordered to arrive.
The camera has a top shutter speed of 1/1000th sec, and the shutter speeds seem accurate when compared to my Leicas.
Unfortunately, the camera did not come with a lens. Can anyone point me to which particular lens goes with this camera? |
| 43 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| levonsa |
Posted - Apr 02 2014 : 4:27:49 PM
Jacques super!!! |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Apr 02 2014 : 09:37:39 AM
Very interesting twins, Alexey!
Are they exactly the same? I suppose you have checked everything...
Congrats! Jacques.
PS: I have too my twins:http://ussrphoto.com/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1266 |
| levonsa |
Posted - Apr 02 2014 : 03:24:04 AM
HI!
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/242014_1122.jpg
|
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Dec 22 2013 : 10:34:38 AM
On one of my Fed S, the precedent owner had turned the lens plate of 90° clockwise. I have used that disposition to put one of my LTM Sonnars = perfect.
I have too an early Industar "Moskva" not coated with tomb s/n 11358: probably a K332, by Princelle. I have just tried it on different bodies. Infinity button at 3 o'clock on a NKVD 1d, at 5 on a 1948 Fed Zorki, at 6 on a Zorki 1b, idem on a 1955 Zorki...
I wonder on which body it is OK!
Jacques. |
| altix |
Posted - Dec 21 2013 : 12:52:22 PM
Yes, it would be interesting to hear the opinion of KMZ specialists. Here are photos of FED and Zorki fitted with the original optics and with Industar-22 Moscow. You can see the positions of the focusing knob which I set to infinity lock.
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/21122013_123.jpg
|
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Dec 21 2013 : 11:49:58 AM
We always speak of standardization "1mm pitch vs Leica pitch", not about the position of the infinity button? Can you mount this lens on your ZZ without forcing?
As far as I know, all the production of KMZ was standardized since the beginning. Are there exceptions? Not impossible: the very first Industar "Moscow" were made with prewar Fed parts. That would mean that the FZ on which this lens was mounted was not standardized... But in that case, the ZK which you speak of would not fit: I'm sure that all were standardized...
Certainly there are KMZ specialists here 
Amitiés. Jacques.
|
| altix |
Posted - Dec 21 2013 : 11:20:38 AM
Thank you, Jacques, for explanation. But now I don't understand why this lens does not mount properly on my Zorki-Zorki 1953 So now I understand that it took some time on KMZ to make the transition to the regular thread that we find on 50's Zorkis. Just recently I was almost convinced that the thread should be similar to the pre-war FED.
By the way, the performance of I-22 Moscow is not bad as I afraid. My pre-war Fed 3.5/50mm of 1939 is in perfect condition but the uncoated I-22 beats it in performance. But it could be my subjective judgement. |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Dec 21 2013 : 09:36:01 AM
No, no, you have not missed anything!
The 1b and 1c could have different positions for the infinity button (globally from 7 to 11 o'clock). It is said that the position of the four screws was regulated for each camera/lens at the factory. The regularity (8 o'clock) was obtained from 1938-39, as it seems.
That can lead to funny looks. I have put a postwar Fed lens on a NKVD: the infinity button is at 3 o'clock...
Concerning the lenses on a Fed Zorki, the ZKs were expensive and sought after, certainly from the origin (1948). We could imagine a parallel market... On one of my FZ, the original lens (which one?) was changed against a 1950 Industar 22 K350...
For the rest, there was a normalisation about the pitch after the war. Before the war: 1 mm by turn. After the war (I don't know the exact date for Fed): 0,976 mm by turn: the Leica gauge. That explains why the postwar lenses generally don't fit the prewar Fed. Or you must force. Or the thread is worn!
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| altix |
Posted - Dec 20 2013 : 4:36:42 PM
Hello,
Just by pure chance I bought today the lens Industar-22 Moscow. I'm a big fan of I-22 and use a lot both rangefinder and SLR versions of it. I was curious about the very early version of I-22.
My sample lacks the original press tab on the focusing arm. It was replaced with the later flat version. You can imagine the way of how so valuable today cameras and lenses were repaired 60 years ago in Soviet Union. In order to fit the new tab a repairman has ground off the part of surface on mounting plate together with the serial number . I can still recognize the traces of the number 4282 (or 4289).
The most interesting is the prehistory of the lens. Of course I wanted to know what happened with the camera. The seller told me that he was also curious and asked this question the original owner of the lens. The owner lives in some small village near Kiev. He wanted to sell some unnecessary photographic rubbish. When the guy who sold me the lens saw this Industar and asked for the corresponding camera. The owner answered that he has Zorki and could offer it with an another lens for 10 euros. The only problem was that the camera was kept in the flat of the owner's son. When the seller arrived to this flat and inspected Zorki he discovered that it was early Zorki (but not FED-KMZ or FED-Zorki) fitted with the ZK lens. Meanwhile, the son of the original owner checked in internet the prizes for the lens and of course asked for the camera much more than 10 euros .
So it seems that the lens was separated with the original camera already in 1950-1951. Sounds rather strange. If the camera failed to work properly then there is no reason to separate the body with the optics since that time the camera could be repaired easily. Most probably the owner of the camera fitted it with the later coated Industar and sold this early version. At least the previous owner possessed this lens and Zorki with ZK since 1950.
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/20122013_1.jpg
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/20122013_5.jpg
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/20122013_6.jpg
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/20122013_7.jpg
It is also funny that this lens does not fit properly the thread of FED NKVD (I mean the correct position of the distance scale) This fact is very surprising for me. Probably I missed something. I thought that all pre-war FED's threads are the same and equal to the early Zorki's ones. |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 28 2010 : 11:07:34 AM
I had seen that 1949 Fed Zorki.
It has just been sold at 40000 kr (about 450€). I had bidden more, but certainly I forgot to do something as I am not the winner...
Perhaps one of us had it?
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| mermoz37 |
Posted - Mar 22 2010 : 07:20:28 AM
which one intersted ?
http://www.artfact.com/auction-lot/fed-zorki-1949-no.05597-346-c-af5b0529c0 |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 4:38:18 PM
Hello,
Thanks to Ulrich and I totally agree with Paul about the later I-22. For example, and only for cameras from 1950/51, I have the KOMZ serial number 5021081 on my Zorki-Zorki n° 32870. All that seems coherent.
But I don't understand the very early numbering. For instance, JLP talks about serial numbers of more 10000 for the K330/332, and I have a # 11359 K330. But what can it mean? These lenses can be found only on Fed-KMZ and Fed-Zorki: so 4500/5000 cameras maxi. And KMZ had no other camera to put these lenses on. So, perhaps they used the same numbering for cameras, lenses, binoculars, and more generally all their production?
As for me, I don't have datas for very early KMZ lenses, as I have for Fed (of course!) and I regret that. If somebody has, it would be of a great help for all. I think!
Amitiés. Jacques.
|
| Paul Sokk |
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 02:54:29 AM
Ulrich,
I have written about this before. I don't know about earlier but I agree about the first two digits of six digits from 1950 (although low number of samples as the numbers didn't start to appear on the front till 1951 or 1952). 1953 and 1954 lenses seem to fit the two digit year pattern. However, my database has no KMZ made collapsible I-22s with 7 digit numbers starting with 55, 56, 57 or later. Most 1955 cameras seem to come with lens numbers beginning with 5 and most commonly 0 (not to be confused with 6 digit 1950 numbers). Most 1956 cameras have lens numbers beginning with 6 and followed by 0, 1 or 2. Same for 1957. The collapsible KMZ made I-50s fitted to the Zorki 5 released in 1958 start with 80. My theory based on this obsevation is that rather than being an exception, betwen 1955 and 1958, the first digit only signifies the year and then the numbers count up consecutively from 0 or some base number so plenty of 60s, 70s and 80s. I have seen x00xxxx numbers but not x000xxx numbers.
It looks to me that KMZ may have first introduced the I-50 in about 1956, discontinued I-22 production in 1957 and discontinued I-50 production in 1958. Collapsible I-50 production by LZOS seems to have commenced in 1957 and continued to at least 1970. LZOS numbers certainly seem to use the year for the first two digits.
Regards,
Paul |
| uwittehh |
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 4:50:08 PM
Jacques,
I don't know how KMZ uses the serial numbers. It seems that on the FED-Zorki the numbers are not corresponding to the serials of the cameras, maybe because they used a lot of different lenses on this camera.
The serial number of the lens on my Zorki 1a matches the number of the camera very close, like we see it on prewar FED's. I think from 1950 on they numbered the I-22 with the year as the first two digits (but as we know not the Zorkis itself...) with the exceptions we know (serial starting with 60, 70 and 80). Maybe Zoom knows more about it :-)
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
| uwittehh |
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 4:44:30 PM
Hi Guido,
the first lens (K340 on FED-Zorki) has serial 147, the second (K345 on Zorki 1a) has serial 6481 which matches to the serial of the camera itself (6760).
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 08:21:42 AM
quote:
I am wondering if the early Industar 22 with the diafragm tab, is longer than the Industar 10 (FED).
The main difference in optics between the regular Industar 22 and the Fed 3,5/50 is the fact that the I-22 is longer.
Good point, Milo.
I have just compared the length: my early MOCKBA (with short diaphragm tab) is just the same length of later Industar 22. So it's not only a reengraved Fed 3,5/50, contrarily to what I thought.
To Guido and Ulrich:
I am (always!) a bit lost about the question of serial numbers on these early I-22. Did KMZ numbered them regularly from the beginning to the K350 (Zorki 1b, 1950)? Certainly not, but I don't own enough I-22 to know how that works.
Amitiés. Jacques.
|
| Guido |
Posted - Mar 18 2010 : 9:08:09 PM
Hello Ulrich
Nice pictures ... but could you say anything about the s/n of this lenses?
Best wishes - Guido
|
| uwittehh |
Posted - Mar 18 2010 : 3:33:39 PM
Guido,
two more variations of the early I-22 lens:
Here a picture of the I-22 that was on my FED-Zorki:
and this is on my Zorki 1a:
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
| Valkir1987 |
Posted - Mar 18 2010 : 2:43:25 PM
quote:
The Industar 22 from KMZ and the so called Industar 10 from FED are not the same construction, I think. But it's just an other story
I am wondering if the early Industar 22 with the diafragm tab, is longer than the Industar 10 (FED).
The main difference in optics between the regular Industar 22 and the Fed 3,5/50 is the fact that the I-22 is longer. |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 18 2010 : 1:03:56 PM
Thanks, Guido. That sounds more clear, between the JLP and your explanations.
What puzzles me too is the variety of very early MOCKBAs (your picture one). Some are really very close to the Fed 3,5/50mm, including the engraving type. Others, like yours, begin to be different. All seem to have the new range of diaphragms. Very interesting lenses, close to the birth of KMZ factory (for cameras).
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| Guido |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 9:38:58 PM
An other correction:
quote:
Originally posted by Guido Studer
In 1948 KMZ build the Industar 22 "Moscow", in 1948 to 1949 the Industar 22 and since 1948 (1947?) the noname Industar 22.
Should say:
In 1948 KMZ build the Industar 22 "Moscow", in 1948 to 1949 the Industar 22 "Zorki" and since 1948 (1947?) the noname Industar 22.
^^^^^^^
Sorry for so much entries ...
|
| Guido |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 9:33:02 PM
Sorry, here are the right pictures:
1:
2:
3:
4:
|
| Guido |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 9:27:57 PM
Hello Jacques
quote:
Originally posted by Jacques M.
As we know, KMZ began with Fed (and Contax) lenses hardly modified: so is my n° 11359. But after, it is not so easy to tell which lens normally fits which type of Fed-Zorki, or even Zorki 1a or 1b (at the beginning).
We know? I didn't know ... and I don't belief.
As I know mostly all Kiev/Contax lenses at this time were made by KMZ. The earlier ones from parts from Germany (the SK series).
The Industar 22 from KMZ and the so called Industar 10 from FED are not the same construction, I think. But it's just an other story.
In 1948 KMZ build the Industar 22 "Moscow", in 1948 to 1949 the Industar 22 and since 1948 (1947?) the noname Industar 22. Some of this lenses you can see on this picture:
(from the page http://www.g-st.ch/privat/kameras/zorkiobjektive.html)
The Industar 22 "Moscow" was not coated in the first run (picture 1), some of them are later. The Industar 22 "Zorki" was coated mostly (picture 2). And the other (early) Industar 22 were coated mostly too (picture 3 maybe from 1952 (or earlier?) and picture 4 from 1953). I have some of them here. For the differences of the coatings I agree, there are some.
The FED-Zorki were delivered with the "Moscow", the "Zorki" and the noname Industar 22 variant over the time (1948/1949). The Zorki 1a (1949) also. And some FED-Zorki's were also deliverd with ZK 50mm/1.5 and ZK 50mm/2.0 lenses by the way.
I think most of the lenses delivered with FED-Zorki's are authentic. I've seen only very few offers with later Industar 22 (or other later lenses) coming with FED-Zorki's.
Maybe it helps ...
Best wishes - Guido
|
| Sangetsu |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 7:52:04 PM
Nope, I didn't clean it, the camera shop did a pretty good job of that, at least on the outside. The inside is another case, it's quite grimy. The rangefinder assembly is rather dirty, and there isn't much contrast, I'll clean it out later on when I replace the bad gear.
The shop I got it from is part of a large used-equipment chain with 4 stores in my area. This particular store sells the less expensive equipment, and they usually have a pretty good selection of old FSU cameras. The other 3 shops don't carry them. But they do a good job of cleaning everything before putting it on the shelf.
This is the second FED-Zorki that they've had this year, the last one was priced at about $200. I was going to pick that one up, but I found a good deal on a dual range Summicron that I wanted for my M4, so I passed on the the Zorki.
They have a couple more FED NKVD cameras which look pretty nice, I'll take a closer look at them next weekend. |
| uwittehh |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 5:21:05 PM
Jacques,
that seems to be a reason. Princelle writes that the MOSKWA lenses are uncoatet, so some people maybe changed their lens to a later coatet I-22 as it can be found on the Zorki 1b.
I also have a Zorki 1a that has the K345 lens. It's coatet the same way as the lens on my FED-Zorki. You can see both lenses and cameras here:
http://fotos.cconin.de/kameras/zorki1.htm#fedzorki
and
http://fotos.cconin.de/kameras/zorki1.htm#zorki1a
Jeff, you are right, it's more a blue coating than a purple one.
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 5:08:02 PM
Ulrich,
No doubt for your K340. My K350 should probably be better on an early 1b. I think some owners of Fed-Zorki changed their non coated lens against a coated one...
Jeff,
Did you clean all that?
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| uwittehh |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 1:48:15 PM
Jacques,
mine is a K340. Princelle writes it's coatet and can be found on FED-Zorki from 1948 and 1949.
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
| Sangetsu |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 06:01:47 AM
I'm not sure what comes originally on the FED-Zorki. My camera's serial number is 3792, the lens serial number is actually 5203.
Shutter surgery was successful, but I found that the intermediate gear on the shutter button is somewhat stripped. Luckily I have an old FED parts camera which seems to have a good gear on it. I hate to disassemble the camera again after getting the shutter properly set up, I'll see if I can find a way of replacing the gear without digging too deeply into it. |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 05:49:08 AM
I am a bit lost with all those I-22! 
For the two early ones I speak of:
- the first is the 11359. It's a "MOCKBA" K330 by JLP with the "tomb". It was on a Fed-Zorki serial number 24xx I have no more. Not coated.
- the second is later. It's an Industar 22-Zorkyi serial number 143, K350 by JLP. It was on my Fed-Zorki n° 3278 when I bought it, but I think it is probably not original. It could have been mounted after. Blue/purple coated.
I think Sangetsu's one is a K332, by JLP. The coating is surprising on such a lens. But I am not a specialist. As for yours, Ulrich, which lens is it exactly?
As we know, KMZ began with Fed (and Contax) lenses hardly modified: so is my n° 11359. But after, it is not so easy to tell which lens normally fits which type of Fed-Zorki, or even Zorki 1a or 1b (at the beginning).
If you know, please...
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| Sangetsu |
Posted - Mar 16 2010 : 6:38:02 PM
Yes, the lens looks coated, but the coating is a little different from my other Industar and FED lenses. It is a pale-blue in color, not as purple as on other lenses. The serial number is 5209. |
| uwittehh |
Posted - Mar 16 2010 : 5:28:14 PM
Jacques,
I believe that my I-22 comes original with the camera. I have the original Box of the FED-Zorki (by the way, lemon-yellow paper on it). The number of the camera matches and I have a I-22 on it.
Unfortunatly there is no lens number written on the box. But this lens is a bit blue/purple coatet. By the way, my lens number is #147 :-)
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 16 2010 : 5:14:14 PM
Ulrich,
My Industar 22/Zorkyi n°143 is blue/purple, you are right.
Perhaps these non original lenses were bought afterwards to put on Fed-Zorki-s ?
Another explanation: these new Industar 22/Zorkyi could have been put on some non sold Fed-Zorki-s after 1949?
Who knows?
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| uwittehh |
Posted - Mar 16 2010 : 4:49:58 PM
Jacques,
I took a closer look. You are right, the MOCKBA I have is also uncoatet. But the I-22 on the FED-Zorki is a bit blue/purple coatet.
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
| Jacques M. |
Posted - Mar 16 2010 : 4:40:55 PM
Hello,
My MOCKBA serial number 11359 is not coated.
On a Fed-Zorki from 1948 too.
Amitiés. Jacques. |
| uwittehh |
Posted - Mar 16 2010 : 3:31:33 PM
Stephan,
I also own a 1948 FED-Zorki with it's original Industar 22 lens.
That's also coatet. And a Mockba lens I own is coatet too. But both are only light blue coatet.
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
| stephanvdz |
Posted - Mar 16 2010 : 3:01:26 PM
and the lens seems coated ?
what a nice set...
Stephan |
| Sangetsu |
Posted - Mar 16 2010 : 12:41:39 AM
Here is a pic of the camera. The guy at the shop I got the camera from said that the lens was the one which came with the camera, though for some reason it was removed to be sold separately, apparently they thought the lens was worth more than the camera.
I'll perform shutter surgery tonight, hopefully by tomorrow I'll have a working camera which I can try out some film with.
|
| Paul Sokk |
Posted - Mar 15 2010 : 5:54:16 PM
What, again? I nust be saving my luck for a big lottery win. Well done.
Paul |
| Sangetsu |
Posted - Mar 15 2010 : 04:13:16 AM
I got lucky today, I found an early Moscow-Industar22 lens which matches my FED-Zorki. The lens is a little loose-feeling, but the glass is clean and unmarked.
I plan to replace the shutter curtains this week, while dry-firing the camera last week one of the curtain ribbons broke (very dry-rotted), so the camera is doing paperweight duty until I get the curtains put in.
I'll post some pics when I get home. |
| Vlad |
Posted - Mar 03 2010 : 10:29:28 AM
 Congrats!!! Wow. If I only had such luck! |
| stephanvdz |
Posted - Mar 01 2010 : 3:43:08 PM
nice find...
wow
Stephan |
| Paul Sokk |
Posted - Mar 01 2010 : 03:36:27 AM
Where I said focussing tab and ring, I of course meant aperture tab and ring. These senior moments are becoming embarrassing. |
| Paul Sokk |
Posted - Feb 28 2010 : 3:56:01 PM
Congratulations on a great find at a bargain price! These have a pretty high "wow" factor and according to the Wiki, only about 5,500 were made. The correct lens is probably an Industar 22 although I understand that a few were fitted with f/2 SK lenses. I believe that these have the year marked on front but somebody else can probably tell you more about them.
There were several cosmetic changes to the earlist 22s and the correct one would depend on your camera serial number. As I understand it from my database of numbers, the order in terms of engraving in 1948 was something like this Moskva (Mockba) with plain (no ray through it yet) KMZ prism, Industar 22 with Zorki only, Industar 22 with Moskva and plain KMZ prism, Industar 22 with plain KMZ prism only.
However,both the Moskva with plain prism and Industar 22 with plain prism have the FED like plain infinity lock plunger instead of Leica-like and focussing tab instead of foussing ring that the others already have. So maybe the order is slightly different in reality.
The ray through the KMZ prism only appeared in later lenses followed by serial numbers being engraved on the front from maybe 1951 or 1952.
If I have got it wrong or out of sequence, I am sure I will be corrected by more knowledgeable people here.
Regards,
Paul |
