Author |
Topic |
|
Vladislav Kern Vlad
USA
4252 Posts My Collection
|
|
Alexander K. AlexanderK
Germany
590 Posts |
|
Vladislav Kern Vlad
USA
4252 Posts My Collection
|
Posted - May 06 2016 : 2:09:52 PM
|
Alexander, from what I understand actually most of them don't and those that do are rare.
Cheers, Vlad |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - May 06 2016 : 2:19:12 PM
|
Yes, I have seen many of them. All I could see had no any number.
|
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - May 06 2016 : 2:32:14 PM
|
The "regular" viewers were delivered normally, without s/n, with the 6,3/100mm lens. Those which are numbered are "extra" viewers, counted as accessories in Fed listings, all the accessories being from 1 to 15xxx, as I think. But the real story of Fed accessories must always be established...
Jacques. |
Edited by - Jacques M. on May 06 2016 2:34:07 PM |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - May 09 2016 : 02:02:34 AM
|
Jacques, what are "Fed listings" ?
|
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - May 09 2016 : 05:12:59 AM
|
I should have said "I had in my Fed listings...". These listings are lost now, but I had put a great part of them in the wiki.
If I sum up: it seems that the prewar accessories were numbered from the s/n 1 to 16xxx (now), with one exception (certainly misengraving). I insist on the "it seems"! Probably by successive batches. But how many accessories in a batch? Were the batches always made of the same accessory? Were there "blanks" between batches? The macro 3,5/50mm lens was certainly considered as an accessory, by its numbering. Finally, how many lightmeters, 100mm viewfinder, selftimers, angled finder, etc ?
We know too that the extra Fed lenses had a separate numberings (from 20xxx to 46xxx). So, no possible confusion.
It would be interesting to take again that work...
Amitiés. Jacques. |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - May 09 2016 : 10:26:56 AM
|
Thank you Jacques. This is very interesting what you wrote. And this is big loss the listings not exist any more.
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|