Topic
Topic author: uwittehh
Posted on: 20160101123720
Reply author: jed
Replied on: 20160101140909
Reply author: uwittehh
Replied on: 20160101144150
Fine, another one and yours has a nice number :-)
Yes, I have seen five digit serial numbers on earlier Kievs but not on a Kiev 4 before.
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de
Reply author: jed
Replied on: 20160102021030
Reply author: altix
Replied on: 20160102051240
Reply author: jed
Replied on: 20160102061421
Reply author: altix
Replied on: 20160102062643
please also note that on these small number Kiev 4 there is a defect in logotype: letters "e" and "B" are not connected as in usual logo.
Reply author: jed
Replied on: 20160102064142
Reply author: Jacques M.
Replied on: 20160102070208
These "short" numbers, for the 1957 Kiev 4, are interesting.
Would it mean a new numbering for this year?
But what do we know exactly about the numberings of these cameras? As for me, I stop in 1952!
Jacques.
Reply author: uwittehh
Replied on: 20160102105958
Reply author: SteveA
Replied on: 20160102134532
Hi, these cameras are interesting. Suspect most know that the Kiev 4 was strongly influenced by the Contax IIIa, and an attempt by Arsenal to modernise the Kiev. Contax IIIa production started in 1951.
Re. the 57203 and 57777 cameras, it appears the top shroud of the light meter was a direct copy of the Ziess original; Arsenal added the re-inforcement swages some time after (suspect because a thinner grade of metal was used compared to Zeiss).
Jed: it looks like your camera may be a hybrid as it has the old Kiev IIa/IIIa type base, back and backlocks. That part of the redesign by Arsenal to match the Contax IIIa was not as successful as the Contax IIIa was a narrower camera whilst the Kiev 4/4A retained the basic dimensions of its predecesor. This apparently lead to film flatness issues and distortion of the back though I have not had such issues with mine.
Cheers,
Steve