Hi Alain,
I take your point, and I'm not being critical of these camera,s, in fact I think they are beautiful and very desirable. Not to mention exceedingly rare. I'm certainly not suggesting that that they have been re-covered to deceive anyone.
There's nothing wrong with the covering of either camera, they are lovely.I just don't think that shiny covering was applied at the Fed factory.
As for there being signs of corrosion around the edges of the covering, well I think that is understandable and normal because the shiny covers may well have been fitted thirty of forty years ago.
To my way of thinking a camera does not have to be in totally original condition as it left the factory to be collectible, in fact I would tend to be a little suspicious of a well used camera that was seventy years old had never had any repairs, improvements, or replacement parts in it's lifetime.
I think the important thing is that any changes should be honestly made, and not done simply to decieve a potential buyer as with fake engraving, etc.
So to change the covering on a camera especially if the old covering was showing signs of serious wear or damage is a legitimate repair, and if done well can even be better than the original.
I believe that honestly made repairs and improvements can actually add to the charactor and desirability of a camera.
In conclusion I agree that both of these early Fed-1,s are superb, though I don't think that I would pay 2000-2500 euros for one of them!!!
