Author |
Topic |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Sep 05 2021 : 08:04:38 AM
|
Hello,
Just one letter of difference between 1e and 1f, but some years of war too and the reconstructiobn of the factory... It is said that Fed recovered "from scratch" in 1948. Perhaps we could discuss (once more ?) of it, with comparative photos. It's what I propose...
The four cameras in photos: - an ordinary late 1e (s/n 183231) - the Fed-Arsenal s/n 00067, - the Red Flag 200977, - the 1f "romashka" 210112.
A photo of the family:
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent2/592021_IMG_0402.JPG
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Sep 05 2021 : 10:03:59 AM
|
What to conclude? Certainly nothing! All that was just to discuss a bit. The question of vulcanite, for example, is very interesting and suggests that there were communications between Berdsk (1e) and Kharkhov (1f). The variability of some 1e, with parts not yet existing in 1941, could denote a post 1941 montage. The nuts made in non painted brass (or only blackened) on the Arsenal, the Red Flag and the very early 1f lets think of a sort of "permeability" between the different spots where Fed parts could be found (and made). Fourth question (for me, I'll stop there!): I am puzzled by the number of old parts (possibly coming from 1a/early 1b) on the known Fed Arsenal. But I know: its existence is contested!
Amitiés. Jacques. PS: if necessary, I can add other parameters and other cameras to the comparison. |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
|
Topic |
|