USSRPhoto.com

Forums / Collectors and Users Open Forum

just arrived in my collection

1023 posts in this thread showing replies 661-680 of 1022
Reply with Quote Edit Reply Delete Reply
Great so it is solved.
I had problems with word комиссионный. It could come from second hand shop or from committee.
But I still don't undestand line with year 1942 and with the first word covered by ink.
Reply with Quote Edit Reply Delete Reply
quote:
Originally posted by Vlad

It says "the date of acceptance for commission"


Thanks Vlad, this was the line I could not understand because of ink and 3rd word which half of it disappiered.
Reply with Quote Edit Reply Delete Reply
quote:
Originally posted by Vlad

The line after the date says "Detailed name and description of item"



What about the line above the date with the partial lens serial?
Reply with Quote Edit Reply Delete Reply
I caught this early Lieningrad yesterday at a local camera fair for its viewfinder.My other two 61xxxx and 63xxxx Lieningrad cameras all have a broken viewfnder that is not possible to repair. This one seems to have a viewfinder that has a solid metal base. I guess this 001848 Lieningrad was made in 1958? It is still in excellent cosmetic condition.Here are some images of the camera and comparison of details with my 1961 one.

Cheers,

Zhang


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1742016_P4186618.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1742016_P4186619.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1742016_P4186620.JPG

Reply with Quote Edit Reply Delete Reply
Some more details images of 001848 and a 61xxxx Lieningrad. Winding and rewind nobs are not exactly the same.
BTW, this defective lieningrad cost about the same as a Nikon F3 and 4x as a Pentax SP at the same market.:) But a vintage Chinese movie lens 20/1.4 in Arriflex standard mount for 35mm camera cost five times as much as a Nikon F3!


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1742016_P4186636.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1742016_P4186637.JPG

Reply with Quote Edit Reply Delete Reply
I couldn't wait to open it to see if I bought a camera with a good viewfinder. If not, my money was wasted. Here it is. A good viewfinder and a parts camera. But I think with a new cloth coutain, I could bring it back to a functioning camera.
The metal base of my 63xxxx camera is full of cracks, but the 001848 one looks much better. I also found that the film pressure plate of the early camera is different although they could be made of the same material (glass?).
Perhaps I sould have posted the messages in a camera repair section?




http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1842016_P4186640.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1842016_P4186641.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1842016_P4186642.JPG


http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1842016_P4186639.JPG

Reply with Quote Edit Reply Delete Reply
Jacques, they really look nice :-)

Some of my new findings:

A Horizont with red label and some differences to normal ones.

First, the digits on the frame counter are bigger:



Second, there is a fixing screw for the viewfinder:



At least it comes with both filters and bakelite grip:



----------------------

Next is an I-50 enlarger lens, looks nice:



----------------------

And this fine Zorki Stereo Set with enlarger mask, viewer and box:











Ulrich





http://fotos.cconin.de

Reply to Topic

Forum code enabled