| Author |
 Topic  |
Will
United Kingdom
47 Posts |
 Posted - Jun 04 2015 : 01:55:50 AM
|
I have this interesting little camera on its way to me:
 |
 |
|
Pierre Tizien
Moxies
France
183 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jun 05 2015 : 3:34:56 PM
|
Came to me not long time ago...
R-Helios-100-OS 100mm/2.5 KMZ
Used on FP-1, similar to Foton-OS , camera to make Oscilographe photo... |
Edited by - Moxies on Jun 05 2015 3:35:53 PM |
|
|
xya
France
159 Posts |
Posted - Jun 18 2015 : 09:10:42 AM
|
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1862015_russ_lens_IMG_0830.JPG
Finally I found a choice of lenses. Nothing extraordinary, but here they are:
First row: Mir 20H s/n 860811 (converted to M42), Industar-69 no s/n (adapted to M39 FFD), Jupiter-12 s/n 9021676 (M39), Jupiter-8 s/n 6226854 (M39),
second row: Industar-26m s/n 1404203 (M39), Industar-61 L/D s/n 947005 (M39), Helios-44 s/n 0256726 (M39 Zenit),
last row: Jupiter-9 s/n 6102545 (M39 Zenit), Jupiter-11 s/n 7102274 (M39 Zenit). Missing on the photo: Orion-15 s/n 760592 (M39).
The Mir came with a custom made adapter M42 to M39. For both possibilities focus is spot-on. They are all standard versions, the Jupiter-9 is a bit strange, it has what seems to be a custom made distance scale, ∞, 30m, 10m ..., perhaps a repair. The 26m was a present from a friendly seller.
|
|
|
Pierre Tizien
Moxies
France
183 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jun 19 2015 : 2:36:18 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by xya
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1862015_russ_lens_IMG_0830.JPG
Finally I found a choice of lenses. Nothing extraordinary, but here they are:
First row: Mir 20H s/n 860811 (converted to M42), Industar-69 no s/n (adapted to M39 FFD), Jupiter-12 s/n 9021676 (M39), Jupiter-8 s/n 6226854 (M39),
second row: Industar-26m s/n 1404203 (M39), Industar-61 L/D s/n 947005 (M39), Helios-44 s/n 0256726 (M39 Zenit),
last row: Jupiter-9 s/n 6102545 (M39 Zenit), Jupiter-11 s/n 7102274 (M39 Zenit). Missing on the photo: Orion-15 s/n 760592 (M39).
The Mir came with a custom made adapter M42 to M39. For both possibilities focus is spot-on. They are all standard versions, the Jupiter-9 is a bit strange, it has what seems to be a custom made distance scale, ∞, 30m, 10m ..., perhaps a repair. The 26m was a present from a friendly seller.
That's a nice set to start lens collection  |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Aug 17 2015 : 08:20:31 AM
|
An interesting beginning of collection, Reinhard!
I fear I was not interested by lenses during years. I was wrong: it's the lens which takes the photo, not really the body!
Here is one of my last purchases: a Zorki 1a/1b. It has the release button of the 1b and still the speed dial of the Fed-Zorki.
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/1782015_DSCF2229.JPG
Amitiés. Jacques.
|
|
|
Pierre Tizien
Moxies
France
183 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Aug 24 2015 : 5:18:19 PM
|
Finaly together again, but this time at my home
With boxes and passports (and filters, caps...)
 |
|
|
Will
United Kingdom
47 Posts |
Posted - Sep 05 2015 : 01:55:29 AM
|
Kiev 4A
 |
|
|
Ulrich W.
uwittehh
Germany
837 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Sep 22 2015 : 3:56:35 PM
|
I was looking for it for a long time, now it arrives, a KIEV Stereo set. It's like new, with original box, instruction manual, passport and the bill! Everything looks as if it was used only a few times. There are some stereo pictures that look as if the previous owner took them.
Really nice.
Together with it comes this very early Jupiter 11 with KIEV mount from 1951.
And there was more, a Zorki SK lens (2,0/50) from 1949 and a Jupiter 9 from 1955 made by KMZ with passport and bill (445 Rubels!). Two yellow filters (40,5 and 49mm) in bakelite box, I have never seen these boxes before.
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
|
|
Robert Vonk
Fotohuis
Netherlands
100 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Sep 23 2015 : 02:17:24 AM
|
Yes a nice stereo set. I was lucky to have that beam splitter as extra with a Kiev-4AM. The adapter was also from 1956 but it was for the Eur. 80,- with Kiev-4AM (refurbished) and J-8M included. Later I realised it was a rare item.
Just a picture:
Robert
"De enige beperking in je fotografie ben je zelf"
http://gallery.fotohuisrovo.nl/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fotohuisrovo/ |
Edited by - Fotohuis on Sep 23 2015 02:18:32 AM |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Robert Vonk
Fotohuis
Netherlands
100 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Oct 02 2015 : 09:45:06 AM
|
In the mean time testing in the Kodak 5222 Double-X film with this Kiev and stereo adapter. E.I. 100 and developed in Windisch W665 an ultra fine grain type developer based on ortho- Phenylene Diamine. Photos will follow. :)
Robert
"De enige beperking in je fotografie ben je zelf"
http://gallery.fotohuisrovo.nl/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fotohuisrovo/ |
|
|
Michael Finder
Michael Finder
Australia
1 Posts |
|
Robert Vonk
Fotohuis
Netherlands
100 Posts
My Collection
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
2002 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Nov 07 2015 : 4:22:22 PM
|
A very "cool" Nicca with complete Fed body!
Regards
LP |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Nov 08 2015 : 12:11:27 PM
|
Yes, Luiz, "cool" is the right word. I will put it in the wiki, in the
"Russian Leica copies", with other pictures.
Amitiés. Jacques. |
|
|
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
2002 Posts
My Collection
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
2002 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Dec 04 2015 : 6:09:38 PM
|
My friend Jacques
The only Nicca without slow speeds were made in the 1943-1946 period
probably not compatible with the FED body you have. Although the preiod could be superposing, politics in the era were not favourable (seems to be)
Best Regards
LP |
|
|
Robert
cyfrowyduch
Poland
4 Posts |
Posted - Dec 11 2015 : 11:54:24 AM
|
Hello everyone, this is my first post in the forum.
I hope not the last :)
And this is my latest achievements.
Zorka C - edition of the Festival.
[URL=http://s770.photobucket.com/user/cyfrowyduch/media/_DSC0762-f_zpsig9ymddd.jpg.html] [/URL]
[URL=http://s770.photobucket.com/user/cyfrowyduch/media/_DSC0767-f_zpsrez45vjp.jpg.html] [/URL]
|
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Dec 14 2015 : 11:29:10 AM
|
Hello Robert!
It seems you love the Zorki C-s...
Perhaps you could introduce yourself and your collection in a new post?
Anyway, welcome here!
Jacques. |
Edited by - Jacques M. on Dec 14 2015 11:29:26 AM |
|
|
Robert
cyfrowyduch
Poland
4 Posts |
Posted - Dec 15 2015 : 1:41:07 PM
|
Jacques Thank you for the warm welcome.
I like Zorka.
My collection is not large.
When it comes to Zorka C is I only have three.
So there is nothing much to show. At least for the moment. |
|
|
Lenny
496 Posts |
Posted - Jan 19 2016 : 06:01:18 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by cyfrowyduch
Hello everyone, this is my first post in the forum.
I hope not the last :)
And this is my latest achievements.
Zorka C - edition of the Festival.
Thanks for your photos Robert,
those Festival cameras are special, the black ones (vulcanite and nylonette) got the Festival logo, but the green and grey ones did not. But we know at least from sovietcams.com that those green and grey ones were delivered with special Festival boxes, so they might indeed also be Festival cameras, at least most of them. Did you get boxes with your cameras too or other information, maybe passports?
I'm also interested to see the backside of the green and grey cameras, would be thankful if you could post those pictures too. |
|
|
Lenny
496 Posts |
Posted - Jan 19 2016 : 06:42:09 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Luiz Paracampo
My friend Jacques
The only Nicca without slow speeds were made in the 1943-1946 period
probably not compatible with the FED body you have. Although the preiod could be superposing, politics in the era were not favourable (seems to be)
Best Regards
LP
Thanks Luiz,
would have been interesting if Nicca copied a Fed. But through the connections to Germany because of the war they might got good information about Leicas, no need to copy a copy.
The only real copy of a Fed might be the Neuca which is comprehensible because they came from the soviet zone GDR. |
|
|
Robert
cyfrowyduch
Poland
4 Posts |
Posted - Jan 23 2016 : 2:24:05 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Lenny
Thanks for your photos Robert,
those Festival cameras are special, the black ones (vulcanite and nylonette) got the Festival logo, but the green and grey ones did not. But we know at least from sovietcams.com that those green and grey ones were delivered with special Festival boxes, so they might indeed also be Festival cameras, at least most of them. Did you get boxes with your cameras too or other information, maybe passports?
I'm also interested to see the backside of the green and grey cameras, would be thankful if you could post those pictures too.
Hi Lenny
I do not have those cameras boxes or documents or any additional information.
As requested I took pictures of the back.
[URL=http://s770.photobucket.com/user/cyfrowyduch/media/_DSC0846-1_zpsnauy6nyp.jpg.html] [/URL]
I throw more pictures of other Zorki and the Fed.
[URL=http://s770.photobucket.com/user/cyfrowyduch/media/_DSC0844-1_zpsfmai4n0g.jpg.html] [/URL]
[URL=http://s770.photobucket.com/user/cyfrowyduch/media/_DSC0816-1_zpss7m8p4rt.jpg.html] [/URL] |
|
|
Lenny
496 Posts |
Posted - Jan 23 2016 : 4:18:33 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by cyfrowyduch
Hi Lenny
I do not have those cameras boxes or documents or any additional information.
As requested I took pictures of the back.
Thank you so much Robert,
your grey nylonette is very clean. Often marks can be seen from the leather case, especially where the closing buttons of the case are. Never put them in a leather case again. |
|
|
Will
United Kingdom
47 Posts |
Posted - Jan 24 2016 : 03:38:12 AM
|
| Very nice Robert. |
|
|
Robert
cyfrowyduch
Poland
4 Posts |
Posted - Jan 24 2016 : 09:34:02 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Lenny
your grey nylonette is very clean. Often marks can be seen from the leather case, especially where the closing buttons of the case are. Never put them in a leather case again.
Thank you for your advice, I'll keep that in mind. |
|
|
Pierre Tizien
Moxies
France
183 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jan 30 2016 : 09:12:05 AM
|
A lucky find.
A seller in Odessa wrote me that he has a lens that could interest me, for 300uah (around 10 euros).
Here is the lens at my friends home already.
Note the serial number, looks like someone made mistake
I'm usualy not in the FED lens collection, but that could be a good start . |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Jan 30 2016 : 09:34:29 AM
|
Ha ha! 10€ for that very rare Fed lens!
The definitive serial number is the good one, by the list we have.
Congrats! Jacques. |
|
|
Ulrich W.
uwittehh
Germany
837 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Feb 01 2016 : 3:39:24 PM
|
Moxies, nice find. And the price... I don't say anything about it ;-)
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - Feb 02 2016 : 2:29:58 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jacques M.
Received today my 46th Fed 1. All are different!
An interesting one, even if not beautiful. It's an 1b with
- a number of 1a,
- brown patterned vulcanite,
- large engraved lettering.
All that makes me think that the (real) serial number could be around 26000.
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/8102011_Fed 1b 4580 001.JPG
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/8102011_Fed 1b 4580 002.JPG
Amitiés. Jacques.
Jacques,
I have just found this site and read this thread.
I think real number of your camera is 14xxx or 13xxx (less possible). It has characteristic vulcanite. Please look at surface of top plate (under cover of rangefinder)it is little bit different than in other FEDs. Remaining details (like advanced knob, shutter release, etc) fit 14xxx too. It cannot be seen clearly on pictures but speed dial should have bigger diameter like in older items of FED.
But I can say nothing about cover of rangefinder. Maybe real number of the camera is 14580 ?
|
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Feb 02 2016 : 3:18:42 PM
|
Probably you are right, Alfa2. And welcome here!
I was too fast when looking at this Fed (I have it in front of me now).
By the width of engraving, no doubt it belongs to a 1b series around the s/n 2xxxx. But the diameter of the speed dial is an earlier one. And the vulcanite can be seen on the 13/16xxx 1b-s, whereas the profile of the release button (much curved) could be even older.
All in all, it cannot be a 13/16xxx because of the width of engraving. Rather a camera made by the factory using spare parts after repair, from several other ones.
But the discussion remains open (in a separate thread if necessary). Thanks!
Amitiés. Jacques.
|
Edited by - Jacques M. on Feb 02 2016 3:21:18 PM |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - Feb 03 2016 : 12:03:35 PM
|
Thanks for your welcome.
You are absolutely right but let me tell/write my theory, which may be not true of course.
There were many poor people in 90's in area of past-USSR who wanted to earn some money. It was usual that servicemen were buying russian cameras on their market and than they were selling them abroad. But they were buying everything even not complete cameras and than combining them to working models which could be sold.
Sometimes there was problem with e.g cameras which were combined from FED in about 50% and Zorki in about 50%. Was it FED or Zorki ? For sure it was not FED-Zorki  .
My theory is your camera is FED 13/16xxx but plate with engravings (cover of rangefinder) is from another camera.
As you wrote discussion was still open. (If moderator decide so it could be new thread.)
It is really plasure to talk/write to you about old cameras.
Thank you. |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Feb 03 2016 : 1:18:32 PM
|
Hi Alfa2!
I prefer we stop here: this thread is not made for such discussions.
I will open a new thread tomorrow about that subject: just the time to put the hand on my photos!
Jacques. |
|
|
Lenny
496 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Feb 26 2016 : 1:56:27 PM
|
A beautiful Fed 1a.
In original condition, as it seems...
Jacques. |
|
|
Aleksandrov66
10 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Feb 29 2016 : 03:24:44 AM
|
Thanks, Aleksandrov. And welcome here!
I had never seen this repro set before in "reality".
About Bunimovitch, in which edition have you found the set?
Amitiés. Jacques. |
|
|
Ulrich W.
uwittehh
Germany
837 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Feb 29 2016 : 2:07:25 PM
|
Fascinating. I have never seen such a device before. Great find Aleksandrov! And welcome to the group.
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
|
|
Aleksandrov66
10 Posts |
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Feb 29 2016 : 3:27:11 PM
|
Wow! (to the reproduction stand) Would you be able to add this to Wiki catalog here?
Thanks!
Vlad |
|
|
Aleksandrov66
10 Posts |
Posted - Mar 01 2016 : 03:42:08 AM
|
G'day Vlad!
Done.
|
Edited by - Aleksandrov66 on Mar 02 2016 12:47:45 AM |
|
|
levonsa
levonsa
Russia
248 Posts |
Posted - Mar 10 2016 : 1:24:07 PM
|
| In 1933, the FED has not yet been issued, its accessories were produced in 1937. So write Bunimovich in 1933 there was still nothing! |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Mar 10 2016 : 2:16:13 PM
|
Yes, Alexey...
I wondered about the date. But I have no book of Bunimovitch, whatever the date is...
Amitiés. Jacques. |
|
|
Alexander K.
AlexanderK
Germany
590 Posts |
Posted - Mar 10 2016 : 3:42:52 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Aleksandrov66
the book is "Camera FED" by Bunimovich D., 1933 (not 1938!).
Sorry, but this book is from 1938 and not from 1933!
And pages from 89 to 99 are really dedicated to reproduction photography.
Regards, Alexander |
|
|
Aleksandrov66
10 Posts |
Posted - Mar 11 2016 : 03:53:03 AM
|
Alexander, Jacques, Alexey...
As far as i understand, there are two types of the book - some books have 1933 on the first page, some have 1938. The interesting moment is that all of them got 1937 or 1938 on the last page. So, in fact all of the books were physically produced in 1937-1938, but a few of them got 1933 on the first page. I suppose this is just a massive misprint.
Some photos:
|
Edited by - Aleksandrov66 on Mar 22 2016 06:19:56 AM |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Mar 11 2016 : 05:32:24 AM
|
Hi Aleksandrov!
Certainly Alexander and Alexey are right.
It should be a misprint, and the last page gives the good date.
As if misengravings, on some Fed covers, were not enough....
Amitiés. Jacques.
|
Edited by - Jacques M. on Mar 11 2016 05:32:53 AM |
|
|
Luiz Paracampo
Luiz Paracampo
Brazil
2002 Posts
My Collection
|
|
xya
France
159 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Apr 05 2016 : 11:42:18 AM
|
Congrats, Reinhart, and thanks for the passport, always very useful for these cameras.
But I read 1949 for the date, no? It should be amazing for a Fed NKVD (probably) made in 1940
Amitiés à toi. |
|
|
xya
France
159 Posts |
|
Lenny
496 Posts |
Posted - Apr 05 2016 : 3:34:39 PM
|
The line above the date means the lens?
That would be quite strange to have the lens before the date with the first 2 digits missing and then after the date the body with complete serial.
However, congratulations, very nice Fed.
Everyone started with the first camera, hahaha, enjoy collecting. |
|
|
xya
France
159 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 02:59:33 AM
|
Yes, Lenny, this passport is a bit strange for a prewar Fed.
It's the first time I see a price, and thsre is no address of factory, for example.
Would it be a bill rather than a passport?
Anyway, it would be useful to have a translation of this paper. If somebody could... Thanks!
|
Edited by - Jacques M. on Apr 06 2016 03:27:37 AM |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 03:46:17 AM
|
From this passport i can see the camera was bought in Moskow in 1942 in Московское управление торговли культтоварами.
There are signs of inspector and of consignor. The paper is rather something like good issue from shop.
Such goods as FED was not on free market. There was no free market in USSR and distribution of such important goods like FEDs was controlled by state administration.
|
|
|
Lenny
496 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 03:55:00 AM
|
Maybe this is from a workshop. This lens was calibrated to the camera body. No other stamp was made on the lens, so you keep this receipt to document that calibration was made.
To me, it was in 1940, the year when this body should be produced. Maybe a replacement for a faulty body. Who knows, translation is needed.
This would explain why only the last 4 digits of the lens were written on the receipt. If this camera/lens combination would be original and new, the lens should have a much higher serial number. Could be, this is the lens the previous owner bought new and after his new camera body got faulty he got a replacement camera body calibrated to his old lens. |
Edited by - Lenny on Apr 06 2016 04:28:47 AM |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 06:01:42 AM
|
I could read almost all words. I cannot read the first word covered by ink. Second word coverd by ink is подробное which means "detailed".
In title is written that this is receipt from special shop number 18 which is placed in Moscow in Московское управление торговли культтоварами. I can see number of camera but I don't see last 3 digits of the lens here.
There is signature of director of the shop too below signatures of inspector and of consignor. There is a price given in digits and in words.
Below there is empty fields to put new price and signs. |
Edited by - Alfa2 on Apr 07 2016 07:14:03 AM |
|
|
xya
France
159 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 06:30:20 AM
|
the seller, who is a russian from moscow, told me that this is a receipt from a commission shop (which is a second hand shop). they were quite common in russia and they still are. in those days it was mandatory to make any second hand sale via a commission shop.
www.a7camera.com www.120folder.com www.instantphoto.eu |
Edited by - xya on Apr 06 2016 06:33:40 AM |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 06:55:19 AM
|
So, it was sold in 1942 as a second hand camera.
The lens can have been changed, of course, as Lenny says: we don't have the original passport. But it can be original too: the lens has often a higher s/n than the body, but not always. |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 07:31:44 AM
|
Great so it is solved.
I had problems with word комиссионный. It could come from second hand shop or from committee.
But I still don't undestand line with year 1942 and with the first word covered by ink.
|
|
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 10:31:41 AM
|
| It says "the date of acceptance for commission" |
|
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 10:35:03 AM
|
| The line after the date says "Detailed name and description of item" |
|
|
Alfa2
Poland
349 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 11:08:24 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
It says "the date of acceptance for commission"
Thanks Vlad, this was the line I could not understand because of ink and 3rd word which half of it disappiered.
|
|
|
Lenny
496 Posts |
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 11:49:36 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
The line after the date says "Detailed name and description of item"
What about the line above the date with the partial lens serial? |
|
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Apr 06 2016 : 11:56:19 AM
|
| "Receipt Stub Number 5489" |
|
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection
|
|
xya
France
159 Posts |
|
Fred_L
France
226 Posts |
|
zhang
Kievuser
310 Posts |
|
zhang
Kievuser
310 Posts |
|
zhang
Kievuser
310 Posts |
|
Juhani Halmeenmaki
cedricfan
Finland
1020 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Apr 18 2016 : 10:46:57 PM
|
Yes, the plate is glass, or at least it should be.
Best regards,
Juhani |
|
|
marcolin
25 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Ulrich W.
uwittehh
Germany
837 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jun 22 2016 : 4:42:52 PM
|
Jacques, they really look nice :-)
Some of my new findings:
A Horizont with red label and some differences to normal ones.
First, the digits on the frame counter are bigger:
Second, there is a fixing screw for the viewfinder:
At least it comes with both filters and bakelite grip:
----------------------
Next is an I-50 enlarger lens, looks nice:
----------------------
And this fine Zorki Stereo Set with enlarger mask, viewer and box:
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Jun 29 2016 : 09:46:01 AM
|
Nice stereo set, Ulrich! Mine is not complete: I miss the mask.
Here, another Fed. An early 1a, the # 1453 in fact, with a correct "1 turn" lens.
Compared to my other later 1a-s, this one has a different vulcanite and an assembling a bit uneven. That "smells the beginning". Happy to get it!
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/2962016_DSCF2466.JPG
Amitiés. Jacques.
|
|
|
Ulrich W.
uwittehh
Germany
837 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Jun 29 2016 : 3:58:51 PM
|
Jacques,
wow, what a nice FED! I always wanted to have one with such a low number :-) But they are hard to find...
Ulrich
http://fotos.cconin.de |
|
|
Juhani Halmeenmaki
cedricfan
Finland
1020 Posts
My Collection
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
|
Robert Vonk
Fotohuis
Netherlands
100 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Sep 03 2016 : 3:36:53 PM
|
Arrived a few weeks ago just before my holidays. A direct parcel from Ukraine with:
An Universal VF for a client.
A J-9 for Kiev/Contax 1961 for US$ 25.
A J-12 for Kiev/Contax 1984 for free.
Together with my Kiev-4AM and the J-8M a good combination. A VF-1 I have already so a good combi with that Jupiter-12 F/2,8-35mm lens.
I will develop the first film with these new optics, a Bergger BRF400 plus (OrWo Filmotec N74+ ) in Pyrocat-HDC soon.
Robert
"De enige beperking in je fotografie ben je zelf"
http://gallery.fotohuisrovo.nl/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fotohuisrovo/ |
|
|
Aidas Pikiotas
AidasCams
Lithuania
973 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Sep 03 2016 : 4:05:58 PM
|
quote:
Originally posted by cedricfan
Smena-4 #002847 (PK2230 with lever)
Please see "rivets" in the name tag.
Unused, from a local camerashop inventory :)
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/372016_smena4.jpg
Best regards,
Juhani
The best congratulations, my friend!!!
I would be very happy to have such a sample in my collection, indeed!
Best regards,
Aidas |
|
|
Pierre Tizien
Moxies
France
183 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Sep 16 2016 : 5:04:31 PM
|
I have received today this Lenar 40-162/3.8, a LOMO zoom cine lens, quite impressiv, results are not bad at all for a 1970's zoom lens!
The lens adapted on my Sony A7
|
Edited by - Moxies on Sep 16 2016 5:08:12 PM |
|
|
Trazin
39 Posts |
|
levonsa
levonsa
Russia
248 Posts |
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Sep 24 2016 : 3:07:44 PM
|
One of the very rare Jena Contax with the double numbering: Jena and Kiev. Thanks, Alexey! And hats off! 
A very interesting detail: the accessory shoe is on the Dresden side: rounded and not square, like on Jena ones. But others share this same feature.
Amitiés. Jacques. |
|
|
levonsa
levonsa
Russia
248 Posts |
Posted - Sep 24 2016 : 3:26:12 PM
|
| Jacques thank you! I specifically did not comments, but you coped just fine !!! Jacques Bravo !!! |
|
|
Juhani Halmeenmaki
cedricfan
Finland
1020 Posts
My Collection
|
|
Alexander K.
AlexanderK
Germany
590 Posts |
|
Vladislav Kern
Vlad
USA
4252 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Oct 24 2016 : 8:30:44 PM
|
Alexander - wow! FS-2 very cool! And a "red" C-112! There's supposedly a KMZ version as well.
Congratulations!
Vlad |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Oct 26 2016 : 2:59:28 PM
|
A FS-2... The dream of a collector!
Bravo, Alexander!
Amitiés. Jacques. |
|
|
Fred_L
France
226 Posts |
|
Alexander K.
AlexanderK
Germany
590 Posts |
Posted - Dec 18 2016 : 12:01:46 PM
|
Bravo, Fred!
Nice lens, I have such one with Nr. 000137.
Regards, Alexander |
|
|
Fred_L
France
226 Posts |
Posted - Dec 18 2016 : 12:16:12 PM
|
Hi Alexander
Does yours have Zeiss serial number on rear glass element?
Fred |
|
|
Alexander K.
AlexanderK
Germany
590 Posts |
Posted - Dec 18 2016 : 12:42:33 PM
|
Hi Fred,
no, also no number.
Regards, Alexander |
|
|
Fred_L
France
226 Posts |
Posted - Dec 18 2016 : 1:26:12 PM
|
Thank you Alexander
I bought it in Vienna, Westlicht auction last month..
Best regards
Fred |
|
|
Alexander K.
AlexanderK
Germany
590 Posts |
|
Pierre Tizien
Moxies
France
183 Posts
My Collection
|
Posted - Dec 18 2016 : 4:53:03 PM
|
| Cool! |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Jan 29 2017 : 10:58:28 AM
|
It's curious that 1948 BK lenses don't have a Zeiss number at the rear... I have 1951/52 Jup 12 which have this number. Perhaps because they are LTM??
A 47 Kiev here, s/n 47168, with a 2/5cm Sonnar and a beautiful pigskin bag:
http://www.ussrphoto.com/UserContent/2912017_1.jpg
It is on the Jena side, like the early s/n 47058 on Sasaki's book.
But impossible to find this book. If you have one which is read, or if you can lend me yours.... Thanks if you can share.
Amitiés. Jacques.
(photo from the seller)
|
Edited by - Jacques M. on Jan 29 2017 11:00:49 AM |
|
|
Jacques M.
France
2604 Posts |
Posted - Feb 06 2017 : 2:22:12 PM
|
Jena front, Jena bayonet. 1947 serial number. Dresden rangefinder, shutters and mechanism after demontage. Original bag.
Nobody concerning the Sasaki?
|
Edited by - Jacques M. on Feb 06 2017 2:46:47 PM |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
just arrived in my collection
